Talk:Mesoparapylocheles

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Monotypy[edit]

I realize the naming convention for the family is incorrect, but so far this family is monotypic; the "fam. nov." indicated in the article's abstract, published very recently, should be enough of an indicator of this. Until someone can prove otherwise, I'm changing this back. Bob the WikipediaN (talkcontribs) 18:50, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I stand corrected-- looks like the living genus got reclassified into the new family. Bob the WikipediaN (talkcontribs) 19:05, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have deleted the inaccurate redirect. --Stemonitis (talk) 19:10, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

More info[edit]

More information from the reference:

--- Two new paguroids, Cretatrizocheles olazagutiensis n. gen., n. sp. and Mesoparapylocheles michaeljacksoni n. gen., n. sp., both based on carapaces, are described and added to the very diverse mid-Cretaceous (Albian-Cenomanian) decapod crustacean fauna of the reefal deposits near Alsasua (Navarra, northern Spain) ---

I think we should add it. Greetings! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.42.165.199 (talk) 16:24, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]