Talk:Mental representation

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cognitive science, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Cognitive scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Cognitive scienceTemplate:WikiProject Cognitive scienceCognitive science articles

Philosophy: Mind / Language / Analytic / Contemporary High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophy of mind
	Philosophy of language
	Analytic philosophy
	Contemporary philosophy

Linguistics: Philosophy of language

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Philosophy of language task force.

Psychology

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

The representation in psychology and the one in filosophy (described in the article) are two different conepts. Differentiation is needed - representation in psychology is closer to internal working models (by Bowlby).

I hope that person who reads it makes the division. :)

15:28, 7 September 2011 (UTC) Marakuja (talk) 15:28, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Someone should be aware that "protoness" which is used in this article is not an actual word - http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/suggestions/protoness I'm not sure what the original author intended when he wrote that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.241.48.21 (talk) 00:13, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Still not a word. I'm posting the text here and deleting the bracketed clause for containing no content (i.e., thought) . . . (joke)

"Content (i.e., thought) emerges from the meaningful co-occurrence of both sets of symbols{ that, in turn, is determined by the semantic protoness of syntax and the syntactic protoness of semantics}." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.155.7.238 (talk) 08:43, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed[edit]

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: Margolis, Eric; Laurence, Stephen (December 2007). "The Ontology of Concepts—Abstract Objects or Mental Representations?" (PDF). Noûs. 41 (4): 562. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 02:44, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]