Talk:Members Only (fashion brand)

Fashion Low‑importance

	Fashion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brands

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Nickelodeon and Millenials[edit]

Article says that in 2016, Members Only collaborated with Nickelodeon to reach Millenials. What? Millenials are in their 30s and probably don't watch much Nick. 165.225.38.81 (talk) 22:46, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Todd Kelshaw interpretation[edit]

Wikipedia "popular culture" sections are rife with poorly referenced examples, but here an example has been cited to a published work of scholarship on popular culture. So please don't remove it. 50.185.134.48 (talk) 01:01, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Here's a great new article regarding the history of Members Only that came out recently via Mental Floss. I added a sentence regarding their shift in advertisement to the "popular culture" section. Definitely more worth adding in from this source if anyone is interested in taking a closer look at it. Cheers Comatmebro User talk:Comatmebro

Members Only Picture[edit]

I am constantly amazed at the population that tries to make themselves famous by adding pictures of themselves related to topics. 137.118.161.59 (talk) 11:58, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]