Talk:Medical privacy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Cal.oasis. Peer reviewers: Rainbowdolph, PandaFantasy.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 00:49, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Lynneeb. Peer reviewers: Socimajor.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 03:46, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What besides information privacy[edit]

What else is their besides medical record privacy? --Gbleem 08:21, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There are also questions of physical privacy. Control of who can see/touch/do what to one's person. e.g. Image:Gynaecology-1822.jpg Zodon (talk) 23:56, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Class review[edit]

Suggestions[edit]

1. I recommend a 'See also' heading be added (before 'References'). As Electronic Medical Records and Patient Records are mentioned, links to these articles could be helpful for readers ('Electronic medical record' and 'Patient health record' are the relevant links). In addition, a particularly useful link to include would be the 'Electronic Health Record' (EHR) article, this covers privacy and confidentiality issues related to the EHR.

2. I also recommend a section for Australia be added under the heading 'Privacy situation by country'. The 2012 introduction of the Personally Controlled Electronic Health Record (PCEHR) has raised pertinent privacy and confidentiality concerns.

I am an Australian university student participating in a Health Informatics project focusing on EHRs. I have an interest in contributing to the 'Medical privacy' article, with a particular focus on the Australian context. Over the next couple of months I hope to contribute to the improvement of this article, as a Wiki editor. Cathy Davis 5IHC (talk) 11:43, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review for Australia - eHealth section[edit]

Quality of Writing

  • The Australian eHealth section of the article complies with the standard writing conventions, that is, well written with correct spelling, good grammar structure, consistent verb tense and punctuation.
  • The information provided is clear, concise, objective and well organised in a coherent format.

Use of References

  • Information provided is based on accurate and reliable sources with many inline citations from a variety of sources such journals and Australian government websites.
  • Most of the references used are relevant, important, and are of good/scholarly quality.
  • The writer has also provided a few internal wikilinks for readers to do further reading and research on the subject.

Content/Information

  • There is evidence that the information provided is based on extensive and careful research.
  • The information provided is interesting and very informative with the following good points:
    • a clear introduction of the Australian PCEHR and its purposes
    • how PCEHR addresses security, privacy and confidentiality issues to protect patients’ health information from unauthorised access
    • good detail research on PCEHR privacy and confidentiality issues.

Format/Layout

  • Text font and size are consistent with the rest of the article
  • Clear heading title on the subject topic

Suggestions for article

  • If patients are withholding important health information from their health care providers how does (or did) PCHEHR operator address this issue?
  • Provide external http links to journal articles for quick referencing.

Daphne Soh (talk) 10:37, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Lakshmi[edit]

  • The article is well written with good introductory lines explaining the topic.section Australia e-health is well written covering most of the privacy aspects in Australia.
  • The topic is well researched with a good description of Personally Controlled Electronic Health Record.
  • The section has obeyed the Wikipedia style and formatting guidelines in respect to bold title headings, linking technical terms to Wikipedia articles and links to external articles.

Suggestions

  • I would recommend adding references to other sections of the article.
  • I would also recommend a further reading section to the article.

Lakshmi Devineni (talk) 11:29, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Medical privacy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:47, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Improving the Medical Privacy Page[edit]

Hello! I plan on improving this page. Below is a bibliography of articles that I plan to use.

Bradburn, Norman M. 2001. “Medical Privacy and Research.” The Journal of Legal Studies 30(S2):687–701. Twight, Charlotte. 2002. “Health and Human Services ‘Privacy’ Standards: The Coming Destruction of American Medical Privacy.” The Independent Review 6(4):485–511. Etzioni, Amitai. 2000. “The New Enemy of Privacy: Big Bucks.” Challenge 43(3):91–106. Alpert, Sheri. 1993. “Smart Cards, Smarter Policy Medical Records, Privacy, and Health Care Reform.” The Hastings Center Report 23(6):13–23. Sobel, Richard. 2007. “The HIPAA Paradox: The Privacy Rule That’s Not.” Hastings Center Report 37(4):40–50. Etzioni, Amitai. 2000. “The New Enemy of Privacy: Big Bucks.” Challenge 43(3):91–106. Peter H. W. Van Der Goes. 1999. “Opportunity Lost: Why and How to Improve the HHS-Proposed Legislation Governing Law Enforcement Access to Medical Records.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 147(4):1009–67. Hiller, Mare D. and Lee F. Seidel. 1982. “Patient Care Management Systems, Medical Records, and Privacy: A Balancing Act.” Public Health Reports 97:332–45 Zittrain, Jonathan. 2000. “What the Publisher Can Teach the Patient: Intellectual Property and Privacy in an Era of Trusted Privication.” Stanford Law Review,52:1201–50. Gostin, Lawrence, James Hodge Jr. , and Lauren Marks. 2002. “The Nationalization of Health Information Privacy Protections .” Tort & Insurance Law Journal 37:1113–38. Parver, Corrine. 2006. “Lessons From Disaster: HIPAA, Medicaid, and Privacy Issues- The Nation's Response to Hurricane Katrina.” Administrative Law Review 58:651–62. Everett, Margaret. 2007. “The ‘I’ in the Gene: Divided Property, Fragmented Personhood, and the Making of a Genetic Privacy Law.” American Ethnologist 34(2):375–86. Woody, Robert W. 2002. “HEALTH INFORMATION PRIVACY: THE RULES GET TOUGHER.” Tort & Insurance Law Journal, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 1051–1076. Wieczorek, Susan M. 2010. “FROM TELEGRAPH TO E-MAIL: PRESERVING THE DOCTOR-PATIENT RELATIONSHIP INA HIGH-TECH ENVIRONMENT.” ETC: A Review of General Semantics, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 311–327. Knapp, John A., and Michael J. Rothman. 2004. “RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN INSURANCE REGULATION.” Tort Trial & Insurance Practice Law Journal, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 511–531. Lengwiler, Martin. 2006. “Insurance and Civil Society: Elements of an Ambivalent Relationship.” Contemporary European History, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 397–416. Hickerson, Kristina A.K. 2001. “CONSUMER PRIVACY PROTECTION: A CALL FOR REFORM IN AN ERA OF FINANCIAL SERVICES MODERNIZATION.” Administrative Law Review, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 781–801. Hosek, Susan D., and Susan G. Straus. 2013. “Privacy of Individual Health Information.” Patient Privacy, Consent, and Identity Management in Health Information Exchange: Issues for the Military Health System, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA; Arlington, VA; Pittsburgh, PA, pp. 19–30 Zielezienski, J. Stephen, and Catherine I. Paolino. “INSURANCE PRIVACY AFTER GRAMM–LEACH–BLILEY — OLD CONCERNS, NEW PROTECTIONS, FUTURE CHALLENGES.” Tort & Insurance Law Journal, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 1139–1179. Peter H. W. Van der Goes, Jr. 1999. “Opportunity Lost: Why and How to Improve the HHS-Proposed Legislation Governing Law Enforcement Access to Medical Records.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review, vol. 147, no. 4, pp. 1009–1067. Miller, Amalia R., and Catherine Tucker. 2009. “Privacy Protection and Technology Diffusion: The Case of Electronic Medical Records.” Management Science, vol. 55, no. 7, pp. 1077–1093. Gostin, Lawrence, O., et al. 2002. “THE NATIONALIZATION OF HEALTH INFORMATION PRIVACY PROTECTIONS.” Tort & Insurance Law Journal, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 1113–1138. Butera, Adam. 2002. “HIPAA PREEMPTION IMPLICATIONS FOR COVERED ENTITIES UNDER STATE LAW.” Tort & Insurance Law Journal, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 1181–1211. Hodge, James G. 1999. “THE INTERSECTION OF FEDERAL HEALTH INFORMATION PRIVACY AND STATE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW: THE PROTECTION OF INDIVIDUAL HEALTH DATA AND WORKERS' COMPENSATION.” Administrative Law Review, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 117–144. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cal.oasis (talk • contribs) 18:59, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Changes to the Third Party Issues page[edit]

Hello all!

I took out the last sentence of the Third Party Issues section, which read "Furthermore, it is not the government that is the reason for many issues with medical privacy, but it is the large corporations that are trying to make profits off of our data." Though many agree with this sentiment, it is still a bit too much of a personal opinion to be appropriate for a neutral Wikipedia page. Instead, I added an example of a controversy surrounding the selling of data, Google's Project Nightingale.

Thanks, HanMiKC (talk) 13:41, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Ambassador Program course assignment[edit]

This article is the subject of an educational assignment at La Trobe University supported by the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2013 Q1 term. Further details are available on the course page.

The above message was substituted from {{WAP assignment}} by PrimeBOT (talk) on 16:06, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Medical_privacy&oldid=1199840740"