Talk:MediEvil: Resurrection

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleMediEvil: Resurrection has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 15, 2015Good article nomineeListed
March 17, 2016Good topic candidatePromoted
April 15, 2020Good topic removal candidateDemoted
Current status: Good article

Untitled[edit]

Please help expand this article. This is my first article, I will be doing more research soon.

I am Spacetimecont 06:01, 7 September 2005 (UTC). I created this page, please help me add a heading, etc. You can help me expand it by going to sources such as IGN, or GAMESPOT.[reply]

Do you want me to add more to the weapons section? I could do that easily :-) Oh and extra characters, I love this game so would be glad to do it RichPlaystation 15:00, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have cleaned up the article. Apparently one of the people who edited this article was not that great with English.....The clean-up header at the top will no longer be necessary. Floodclaw 20:58, 19 February 2007

Soundtrack[edit]

First point: original research? I am certain that the artist is "The City of Prague Philharmonic Orchestra & Chorus", composed by "Bob & Barn". Hmm...

Second point: Something I wanted to mention was that you can download the complete game soundtrack off the website. I did this by emptying my Internet Explorer temporary files first, then visiting the website and playing all the tracks on the "Audio" button - not switching tracks until each of them had finished loading/downloading. Then, once each track was finished, I simply browsed to my IE temp folder and copied the MP3 music files which Flash saved in there. This also allowed me to get the URLs, e.g. http://fp.scea.com/PSP/Games/MediEvil_Resurrection/OGS/music/Cemetery_Hill.mp3 --rjcuk 21:53, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You realise that is off the soundtrack of a different game right? yours is off of Medievil for the PS1, this is Medievil Ressurection for the PSP. RichPlaystation 00:38, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Fair use rationale for Image:Medievil ressurection cover.jpg[edit]

Image:Medievil ressurection cover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:37, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Amateurish writing[edit]

This entire article is in dire need of a complete rewrite into an NPOV and devoid of weasel words. I kept finding sentences and remarks that are completely irrelevant to explaining the game's items as well as the plot. 21:42, 27 August 2008 (UTC) White Mage Cid

Tagged for complete rewriting, since nobody seems to care for it. 00:45, 6 October 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by White Mage Cid (talk • contribs)

GA Review[edit]

GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:MediEvil: Resurrection/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: AdrianGamer (talk · contribs) 14:23, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Comments[edit]

Infobox[edit]

Lead[edit]

  • MediEvil: Resurrection is a 2005 is a Gothic action-adventure game - Should be "MediEvil: Resurrection is a 2005 Gothic action-adventure video game
  • It was also re-released on the PlayStation Network in 2008. - Personal opinion, but I prefer "for" instead of "on"
    • Me too, re-worded JAGUAR  13:22, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • The game also features a variety of voice talent - "talents"
  • Sony Computer Entertainment Europe commissioned SCE Cambridge Studio to develop a launch title for the upcoming PlayStation Portable - remove "upcoming"
  • only a year to develop a game - "the" game
  • thus they decided to "remake" the original MediEvil. - Quotation mark is not necessary
  • The game was met with mixed to positive reviews upon release, - Not clear enough. It is either mixed or positive, not in the middle
    • Re-phrased to "mixed" JAGUAR  13:22, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Main content[edit]

  • to the Hall of Heroes where a legendary hero will reward him with a new weapon - Change it to something like "to the Hall of Heroes, where a legendary hero rewards him by giving him a new weapon"
    • Re-phrased, thanks JAGUAR  13:37, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • The remastered version also includes some exclusive mini-games which can also be played in multiplayer - Any examples? Can the game's multiplayer be further expanded?
    • The sources don't explain the minigames well or how they work, but from what I could gather the minigames are arcade-style and work over Wi-Fi, so I've put that in JAGUAR  14:38, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • which never appeared in the original - should be "has never been" appeared in the original
    • Changed to "which has never been in the original" JAGUAR  13:37, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Various level and characters designs - "levels"
  • casting a spell over Gallowmere to awaken his undead army - "awake" instead of "awaken"
  • a genie who was robbed of his powers by Zarok - change to "a genie whose powers were robbed by Zarok"
  • The senior management team of Sony Computer Entertainment Europe wanted a launch game for the upcoming PlayStation Portable console - "upcoming" is again not needed
  • Due to the short notice, the Cambridge studio was given only a year to develop a game - "the" game
  • thus it was decided that a "remix" of the original MediEvil - "remix" or "remake"?
    • "Remake" sounds preferable, so I re-worded it to that without the quotations JAGUAR  13:37, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • developing an original title would likely have taken considerably longer - "would take more time to develop" sounds much simpler
  • Re-phrased JAGUAR  13:37, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Chris Sorrell, the creator of MediEvil, stressed in a retrospective interview that he would have preferred to direct Resurrection if he was not at the time instructed to direct the video-game adaptation of 24: The Game - An adaptation of 24, not 24: The Game
    • Linked to the TV show JAGUAR  13:37, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • He directed overall development of the title - missing "the"
  • by Dominic Cahalin. Mitch Phillips, who was the character animator, was appointed as lead artist for the game - "were", "animators", "artists" - two people
    • I'm afraid I don't understand this part, Cahalin and Phillips were working on two different things? They both weren't both animators or artists I think. How else would you want me to re-word it? JAGUAR  13:37, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
      • I misread that part. Just ignore this comment.
  • Phillips, along with Bob & Barn, the soundtrack composers, were the only people from the original team to return - Cahalin is not counted. "Soundtrack composers" sounds weird. Did they compose the music for the original game? It is not represented clearly here
    • Cahalin wasn't part of the original team, he was one of the new guys. Bob & Barn composed everything for the first game, so I've rephrased that part. I also mentioned who Bob & Barn actually are JAGUAR  13:37, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
      • I misread that part. Just ignore this comment
  • I don't think you need to call them "the Cambridge studio" since there is no other co-developer for the title. "the studio" is enough
    • Re-phrased for all mentions JAGUAR  13:37, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • preserve ideas that they thought worked well in the original, though their use was - should be "their uses were"
  • new themes were created or remastered - I don't think new themes can be "remastered"
  • That red link looks very odd. I doubt the page will even be created in the future. So, you should remove it
  • This follows in the tradition of SCE Cambridge Studio - "in" is not necessary
  • MediEvil: Resurrection received mixed to positive reviews upon release. - "mixed to positive" is vague
    • Removed "positive" JAGUAR  13:42, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • reviewers were directed at the camera control - camera controls (consistency with the lead, or you change the lead to "camera control"
    • Changed to "controls" JAGUAR  13:42, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • but becomes "rather clumsy in the middle of a heated battle" - "became"
  • combat sequences into a "frustrating and tedious guessing game" - combat sequences cannot be not a game. You should change it to "combat sequences to a "frustrating and tedious" experience
    • Rephrased, thanks JAGUAR  13:42, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Chris Sorrell and Jason Wilson, co-creators of MediEvil, have also expressed disappointment with the game. - "had"
  • Jason Wilson felt disheartened with having to watch something he "cherished" to be altered with decisions he thought were "questionable" - "Wilson" instead of "Jason Wilson"
  • Sorrell felt similar disappointment in the redesign of the game and how there were a number of aspects of it that he disagreed with - "how" is not necessary
  • and more interesting to listen to than "the average voice-over" - can't find this quote in the Eurogamer source
  • which is often compared to that of Tim Burton's The Nightmare Before Christmas. - which "he" compared to that of Tim Burton's The Nightmare Before Christmas.
  • Should swap the position between the third paragraph and the fourth paragraph
    • I agree, done JAGUAR  13:42, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

References[edit]

  • I cannot check whether the content of the gameplay section is true or not because the IGN link is dead or redirected
    • Was it this link that you tried? It works fine for me as it's the main IGN review by Jason Allen which I used to source some of the gameplay as he talks about a lot of it in the review. If it still doesn't work for you, I could try archiving it to see if it works? JAGUAR  14:02, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Few other links are redirected as well
    • Just discovered that one of the was a duplicate, so I removed it. The other refs that were counted as "changes sub-domain" worked fine for me, although they were slow. JAGUAR  21:36, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • MediEvil Boards really looks like a forum source. I understand that it is an interview but the site itself does not show any reliability to me. Is there any replacement?
    • Hmm. I'll see what I can find. I realise all forum boards are discouraged by WP:VG/RS but the MediEvil Boards is where I could find all of the ex-developers. I'll see what I can do, but if all else fails I'll have to remove the whole thing. JAGUAR  14:02, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
      • The MediEvil boards are used both in the other two MediEvil articles which are GAs, and I hate to do it, but I've removed it from this article because I don't know what else to do JAGUAR  21:36, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Images[edit]

Overall[edit]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and y:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. Has an appropriate reference section:
    B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
    B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

A great article. There is some small problems though. If you had addressed all the issues I mentioned above, the article should be good to go. AdrianGamer (talk) 05:10, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@AdrianGamer: thank you once again for an excellent review! I think I've addressed everything, if you can take a look? I had to remove the MediEvil forum ref altogether as I can't find anything else to replace it. I have addressed all other concerns. Thanks again, JAGUAR  21:43, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Kristan Reed from Eurogamer did not say that the voiceovers are more interesting to listen to than "the average voice-over". That's the only problem left. AdrianGamer (talk) 04:12, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oops. I wrote that twice because I got it mixed with the GameSpot review. I've removed that quote and added the fact that they mentioned Baker's voice was eccentric. JAGUAR  16:17, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
With all the issues fixed, MediEvil: Resurrection promoted to . Congratulations. AdrianGamer (talk) 04:51, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks again, Adrian! JAGUAR  16:19, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Soundtrack lyrics[edit]

Exist something? I tought could be interesticg add something about this.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:MediEvil:_Resurrection&oldid=1203955413"