Talk:Mary Agnes Chase

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 30 September 2020 and 1 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Allisonkirkpatrick. Peer reviewers: KHuckaby1920, Sbowen99, Abomb66.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 00:38, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mary Agnes Chase. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:05, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

peeer review[edit]

Wow, this is a pretty beefy page! I like the flow and neutrality of your life and career section, but do you know anything about her earlier life? It seems to jump right into her achievements but some background may help to humanize her. Just a suggestion, this section has good flow and information. Good intro the the suffrage movement! There is a ton of information here and you sources seem good. If anything, I think adding more about her scientific accomplishments in botany may help to balance the article a bit. That being said, I think you could add some more to the lead. There is a lot about her being a suffragist and that should probably go into the lead. Your structure is clear by and large, but it sometimes feels just a little bit jumpy between paragraphs, maybe edit some transitions a little bit. Compared to how much suffragist stuff there is, maybe consider adding some more stuff to the previous section. Overall you seems to keep a neutral tone with reliable sources, great start! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abomb66 (talkcontribs) 18:02, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]