Talk:Market Forces (The Spectacular Spider-Man)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: maclean (talk) 00:23, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see Wikipedia:What is a good article?)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
Notes
  • written by Andrew Robinson and directed by Dan Fausett.[1] - I don't see this in citation 1.
  • The animators reportedly had "fun" using the animation style.[1] - I think this mischaracterizes the reference. This makes it sound like the animators were laughing and clapping while doing the animation but the ref is refering to the animators being creative with the animation style.
  • Why does one ref say that Victor Cook was the director?
    • It says that for all the episodes, but its wrong. The Flash {talk} 03:40, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      • If all this source is doing in referencing "S1E04" production number, can it be removed? I'm questioning its reliability according to WP:RS's "reputation for fact-checking and accuracy". maclean (talk) 19:26, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
        • Oh, it's not unreliable — it's Marvel Comics official website, there's nothing unreliable about it. It's just wrong about directors, probably because Cook is a supervising director for the entire series. The Flash {talk} 20:28, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • The quote "keeps up the bandwagon of great writing, with some nice payoffs to the past two, story progression and set up." is used twice.