Talk:Maria Anna Katharina Rutowska

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility.

Poland Low‑importance

	Poland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rutowska or Orzelska?[edit]

Who is really on those paintings? In numerous sources, this painting is titled Anna Orzelska. A.J. (talk) 12:56, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's true. When I post these paints in the Countess Orzelska later were deleted and said to me that paints were of Countess Rutowska..So, I don't know who is the true...if anybody can resolve these please be free to made the correction to the article. Thanks a lot and sorry for my bad english!!!! Aldebaran69 (talk) 19:39, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It seems we were deceived by anonymous editor -- if he/she will appear again, should be asked for sources. A.J. (talk) 15:49, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]