This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dallas-Fort Worth, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Dallas-Fort WorthWikipedia:WikiProject Dallas-Fort WorthTemplate:WikiProject Dallas-Fort WorthDallas-Fort Worth articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Health and fitness, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of health and physical fitness related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Health and fitnessWikipedia:WikiProject Health and fitnessTemplate:WikiProject Health and fitnessHealth and fitness articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Marketing & Advertising, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Marketing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Marketing & AdvertisingWikipedia:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingTemplate:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingMarketing & Advertising articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Retailing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of retailing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RetailingWikipedia:WikiProject RetailingTemplate:WikiProject RetailingRetailing articles
–When a task is completed, please remove it from the list.
The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
Zrex00 (talk·contribs) has been paid by unknown on behalf of Mannatech. Their editing has included contributions to this article. This user has been banned and may therefore be reverted on sight, per WP:REVERTBAN. Blocked for UPE then for socking
Pro Amateur (talk·contribs) has been paid by unknown. Their editing has included contributions to this article. This user has been banned and may therefore be reverted on sight, per WP:REVERTBAN. Blocked as sock of Zrex00
MZT35 (talk·contribs) has been paid by unknown. Their editing has included contributions to this article. This user has been banned and may therefore be reverted on sight, per WP:REVERTBAN. Blocked as sock of Zrex00
JohnT52 (talk·contribs) has been paid by unknown. Their editing has included contributions to this article. This user has been banned and may therefore be reverted on sight, per WP:REVERTBAN. Blocked as sock of Zrex00
Jimlaker66 (talk·contribs) has been paid by unknown. Their editing has included contributions to this article. This user has been banned and may therefore be reverted on sight, per WP:REVERTBAN. Blocked as sock of Zrex00
OP was a sock Jytdog (talk) 14:42, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
There's no denying that all facts listed in this article are from RSS, however reviewing this article in its entirety, by my count, there are 39 Negative Facts and 0 Complimentary facts?? There is no way this article does not violate NPOV? (Jimlaker66 (talk) 19:38, 4 October 2017 (UTC))[reply]
And what is your relation to the topic in question?
Note, their first edit in WP was filing this at NPOVN, an hour before they left the note above. Jytdog (talk) 19:59, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
So is this article representative of what Wikpedia has come to? i.e. Neutrality is a thing of the past?(Jimlaker66 (talk) 20:10, 4 October 2017 (UTC)) Jimlaker66 (talk) 20:06, 4 October 2017 (UTC))[reply]
"NPOV" does not mean "fair and balanced", it means that content reflects what reliable, independent sources say. Jytdog (talk) 20:09, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Please have the courtesy to thread your comments. See WP:INDENT. Jytdog (talk) 20:09, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Also per WP:TPG do not change your comments after others have replied to them. I changed your comment back to the version that was replied to. Jytdog (talk) 20:11, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Care you provide a positive fact, care to suggest an addition?Slatersteven (talk) 17:57, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Pubmed is a reliable secondary source for peer-reviewed, medical literature, is it not? (Jimlaker66 (talk) 19:59, 6 October 2017 (UTC))[reply]
Pubmed is a web-based index of the biomedical literature. It is not a source in itself. Many kinds of sources are indexed in pubmed. WP:MEDDEF describes the kinds of sources that are reliable for content about health in Wikipedia. Jytdog (talk) 20:28, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
I have remove two paragraphs as WP:OR sourced to primary sources. They are below:
In November 2017, Mannatech was cited by the FDA for illegally marketing several of its supplement products as medicinal agents and for selling adulterated and misbranded products in violation of Title 21 Code of Federal Regulations and Current Good Manufacturing Practice in Manufacturing, Packaging, Labeling, or Holding Operations for Dietary Supplements regulations.[1]
In September 2005, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Mannatech for alleged violations of the Securities Exchange Act. The plaintiff class accused Mannatech of violating the act by "issuing a series of material misrepresentations"; specifically: failing to control its sales associates and allowing them to make false claims concerning the efficacy of Mannatech products. This caused a misleading price inflation of the company's stock.[2] The plaintiffs were purchasers of Mannatech stock during the period August 10, 2004 through July 30, 2007.[3]
The first paragraph was reverted in this edit with only an FDA document as a source. To show notability, we need a secondary source.
.jpg){kind=small}
