Talk:Manifesto Against Work

	Organized Labour portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organized Labour, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Organized Labour on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Organized LabourWikipedia:WikiProject Organized LabourTemplate:WikiProject Organized Labourorganized labour articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sociology Low‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Should we delete this article?[edit]

Not only is it written like an essay, it also doesn't cite many sources and relies on primary sources and I don't see a lot of importance in this article... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bigeshjen (talk • contribs) 22:34, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again SPECIFICO[edit]

Hello again SPECIFICO

Since you are keen to note wikirules you might know of the three revert rule?

However, I can for sure talk to you about why you think that we should keep the old version.

I remain in my position that we should use the improved edition which has additional secondary sources, rephrased content and corrected spelling by Oculi.

It would be interesting to hear if you have any argument against this edit. It is especially interesting due to that I think many would see it as a clear improvement.

Any comments from you on how to improve the article is greatly appreciated.

Kind regards

Pauloroboto (talk) 17:42, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have no time to spare for improving this article right now. I'm just trying to prevent damage. Your edit is making it worse, and you need to present detailed reasoning on the talk pages after they're reverted -- then you will learn whether anyone agrees with you. SPECIFICO talk 20:37, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Bigeshjen: FYI in case you care to comment. SPECIFICO talk 20:47, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Uhm.... Why am I pinged? Bigeshjen (talk) 20:49, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just cause I saw you previously commented above but I suspected you did not have the page on your watchlist. Nothing to do if OP does not present any substantive discussion.Thanks for the reply. SPECIFICO talk 21:04, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]