Talk:Magazine (artillery)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Magazine (artillery) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: Technology / Weaponry C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force

Untitled[edit]

"the Royal Navy no longer owns nuclear weapons"? Since trident is operated by the ROyal Navy I assume that this is a typo and actually means Royal Air Force. Or is Trident officially NOT operated by the Navy? 62.143.59.116 (talk) 18:32, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Civilian useage[edit]

In Australia "magazine" can refer to storage for explosives at a mining or quarry site, also a secure area in retail stores which cater for the needs of farmers etc. Is this universal? and should the scope of this article be expanded? Doug butler (talk) 23:31, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Magazine (artillery). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051203055908/http://colonialwilliamsburg.com/Almanack/places/hb/hbmag.cfm to http://www.colonialwilliamsburg.com/Almanack/places/hb/hbmag.cfm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:50, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]