Talk:MTR Metro Cammell EMU (AC)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hidden message[edit]

Sorry I don't comprehend the meaning of {61組3卡(分別為E1-E45及E46-E61...)} even though I'm Chinese. The phrase is confusing and tricky and i think only the HK railway maniax will understand. ( an perplexed anon editor)

From context I'd take it to mean "KCRC ordered the trains in 2 batches(E1-E45 and E46-E61) made up of 61 sub-batches each of three cars."
Or in long hand: E-1 to E-45 constituting the first batch, E46-E61 constituting the second batch. E-1 is the serial number for a production group of three cars or carriages (i.e 卡), E-2 the serial second production group etc, so that from E-1 to E-61 there are 61 sub batches. You don't have to be a "HK railway maniax" to understand it, though I think being an anorak in general helps though. KTo288 (talk) 16:53, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was page moved. @harej 00:40, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]



MTR MLR Train EMUEast Rail Line Metro Cammell EMU — MLR refers only to the refurbished trains, not the refurbished and unrefurbished trains as a whole. The person who changed the name to MLR Train might not have considered the unrefurbished units seen in the 1980s and 1990s. --Mbssbs (talk) 03:32, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:MTR Metro Cammell EMU (AC)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Not the best grammar, so it needs to be cleaned up (see Wikipedia:Manual of style). If possible, it needs a little bit more information. Melkittycat (talk) 01:48, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Substituted at 18:29, 17 July 2016 (UTC)