Talk:MONA number

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 17 January 2021 by reviewer The Earwig (talk · contribs).

Lepidoptera Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lepidoptera, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of butterflies and moths on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LepidopteraWikipedia:WikiProject LepidopteraTemplate:WikiProject LepidopteraLepidoptera articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

When this goes live ...[edit]

When this goes live:

the redirects Hodges number and MONA number, should be changed to go to this article
the disambiguation page Mona, should have a link to this article
the template Template:Taxonbar databases, should have it's MONA link change to this article

and their are undoubtedly others. I would be happy to work on that.

Thanks, SchreiberBike | ⌨ 21:04, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edits for clarity. SchreiberBike | ⌨ 04:59, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC comments[edit]

Should this be merged with List of moths of North America instead of having a separate article? — The Earwig ^talk 06:08, 17 January 2021 (UTC)}}[reply]

As someone who works on Wikipedia primarily on moths, I think it stands on its own. MONA number or Hodges number are widely used. Rather, some of the material at List of moths of North America should be removed and this article linked on that page. SchreiberBike | ⌨ 06:27, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]