Talk:Lyse Doucet

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Lyse Doucet article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Low-importance).

BBC Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks for WikiProject BBC:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Improve BBC, BBC News (TV channel) and BBC News to Good Article status following previous reviews, create BBC Computer Literacy Project (in light of forthcoming 30th anniversary)
Cleanup : Chucklevision - references and general clean-up, Pebble Mill Studios - over-detailed and long, BBC World Service Television - unreferenced and confusing
Copyedit : BBC News, Broadcasting House
Expand : Top 20 start-class BBC articles with most importance: BBC Japan, BBC World Service Television, BBC Lifestyle, BBC Two Northern Ireland
NPOV : Criticism of the BBC (See comments)
Stubs : Stub-Class BBC articles
Other : *Restructure the category
- Add infoboxes to the BBC articles without infoboxes
- Add free-use images to biographical articles where possible
- Add references to Goa Mix (see assessment) and Coat of arms of the BBC
- Return Dad's Army to a Good article. (See comments)
- Reassess BBC following improvements to article.

Journalism Low‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Canada: New Brunswick Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject New Brunswick.

Western Asia Low‑importance

	Asia portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Western Asia, which collaborates on articles related to Western Asia. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Western AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Western AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Western AsiaWestern Asia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Radio: UK Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Radio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RadioWikipedia:WikiProject RadioTemplate:WikiProject RadioRadio articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This page is within the scope of the UK Radio taskforce. New members are always welcome!

To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Create: Missing years and articles in radio, National Association of Radio Distress-Signalling and Infocommunications (Hungary)
Assess : Unassessed Radio articles; Unknown-importance Radio articles
Cleanup : Radio articles needing attention
Expand : Midweek Politics Bob Crane
Maintain : Portal:Radio
Stubs : Expand: Radio stubs
Verify : Unreferenced BLPs
Other : Collaboration of the Week:
Requests for Radio peer review:

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

[Untitled][edit]

There's a 2002 article about Lyse on the Guardian web site: http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2002/jan/08/broadcasting.bbc

Would it be appropriate to link to it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dinch (talk • contribs) 22:37, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know where the idea comes from that LD "is almost unknown to the domestic British audience". She is a regular correspondent for BBC News 24 (TV) and BBC Radio 4, and also appears on BBC news bulletins on other BBC channels, especially if a Middle East story is current.

The BBC has had an integrated news operation for several years now and reporters provide material for all BBC domestic and international channels including online services. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.176.142.11 (talk) 15:46, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Similar sounding Élise Lucet[edit]

I've added a disambiguation reference to Élise Lucet because, with Lyse Doucet's name following a French manner of pronunciation, the names sound confusingly similar. Philh-591 (talk) 17:00, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Self-serving article?[edit]

Especially the introduction and Early Life and education paragraphs read a lot like a linkedin intro, leading me to believe that the article has at least in part been created by LD herself. While this is not really an issue in principle, adding comments like "Doucet speaks English and French (and is always trying to improve her Dari and Arabic.)" seems like a misuse of Wikipedia. (Note there are no sources for this claim either.)Archach (talk) 02:07, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely agreed. I recall seeing her interviewing someone in Egypt years ago when there was a new constitution coming out and she walked into a cafe on camera and managed to fumble out the words "constitution? good?" with very poor pronunciation. The men in the cafe did not look impressed. I find the claim about Arabic highly dubious. 2C0F:F698:C108:DED6:15F6:8C6B:B48F:C7F4 (talk) 20:11, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is undoubtedly written and curated by the subject, parts read like a CV. Nothing on her personal life for example. These types of CV wiki pages should be improved or deleted. Rustygecko (talk) 19:58, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Wikipedia needs to decide whether it aspires to being an encyclopaedia, in its articles about living people, or a premotional vehicle. Currently, its lack of editorial standards (I'm not referring to the rules by which Wikipedia 'editors' operate, but to the editorial expertise and control that would apply to a real encyclopaedia) results in a lack of consistency and quality. So many articles about living people lack the sort of information that would be expected in a properly and consistently edited encyclopaedia (in this case, schooling, personal details, spouse / partner, children, etc) and, instead, are overloaded with a cv, often self-aggrandising, such as might be attached to a job application. This really is something that needs to be addressed for Wikipedia to be taken seriously. As it is, parts of it are little better than the sort of self-promotion that would be expected of social media. Unfortunately, its modus operandi (volunteer editors but no overall editorial control, so no quality standards - a set of rules really does not address this gap) does not lend itself to a consistent reference work and makes it highly vulnerable to being usurped as a means of promotion, as seems to be the case here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.139.218.171 (talk • contribs) 09:21, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

IP 86. Just like every other editor, you are free to improve this article. If you think this article is just "self-promotion that would be expected of social media", by all means go ahead and improve it, and give explanations in your edit summaries of what you're doing and why. Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 10:27, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why ever do you think LD needs to massage her WP article to make it more promotional? She isn't some sort of reality TV 'celeb' trying to build a career. If you think there are WP:COI issues with the article, you should present some evidence. --Ef80 (talk) 21:02, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Mi'kmaq people[edit]

Is there any supporting text in the article for this Category? Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 12:45, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The BBC source "here says "Canadian with Acadian, Irish and Migmaw ancestry". So I guess that's just an alternative name for Mi'kmaq. Martinevans123 (talk) 13:42, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pronunciation of first name[edit]

On the radio this morning, she introduced herself as leeze. 86.4.118.201 (talk) 10:13, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just after 7 a.m. on BBC Radio 4's Today? Not convinced. To me it sounded more like this. Martinevans123 (talk) 13:04, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For sure it is li:z. I say that as a Canadian and a French-speaker who knows many Lise/Lyses, and who also has training in phonetic transcription. Thanks IP.--Slp1 (talk) 20:55, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not doubting your phonetic transcription skills for a moment. And I'm sure all your lovely French-Canadian Lise/Lyses are all really super and that... But can we go anywhere that's regarded as WP:RS?? Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 21:04, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well it sounds like you are doubting my skills, as well as those of the IP.... Do you have a reliable source for li:s? --Slp1 (talk) 21:16, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your skills as a transcriber or your skills as Lise/Lyses-knower? Do we have a WP:RS reliable for either? Talk page claims don't really make it. Martinevans123 (talk) 21:24, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Phonetic transcriptions are often unsourced, as you seem to know, as you earlier argued for li:s based on what you personally heard in a youtube video or on Radio 4. In this case, two editors disagree with your perception of what you heard. One has phonetic ear training, IPA transcription and other experience... whether you have any respect for subject experts is up to you, although some wikipedians seem to see their value at times WP:EXHELP But I agree with your basic suggestion though. If you want to overturn the consensus here, please find some reliable sources for li:s. --Slp1 (talk) 22:11, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Shucks. I knew I should have kept up with those phonetic ear sessions. 😢 Martinevans123 (talk) 22:56, 24 February 2024 (UTC) ... well, that's decided then![reply]