This article is within the scope of WikiProject Catalan-speaking countries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history, languages, and cultures of Catalan-speaking countries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Catalan-speaking countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Catalan-speaking countriesTemplate:WikiProject Catalan-speaking countriesCatalan-speaking countries articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
I came from another article regarding the [language controversy] and to my surprise found that ALL of the sources referenced here are higly biased, coming from those affiliated with "Blaverism" (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blaverism). Although most of its content is accurate, there are subtle parts that are deliberately manipulated (the ones I've labeled), mostly concerning to figures, numbers and proportions that do not correspond to the currently accepted thesis by the historian world. Antonio Ubieto and Leopoldo Peñarroja are the two sources that this community use to cite as their mainly support to their thesis, not being recognized by the academic world. They even cite one of their pages (blog of Teresa Puerto), probably a self reference. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.43.206.58 (talk) 18:27, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
