Talk:Lithuanian partisans

Lithuania High‑importance

	Lithuania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lithuania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lithuania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LithuaniaWikipedia:WikiProject LithuaniaTemplate:WikiProject LithuaniaLithuania articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Review comments: Renata (talk) 17:32, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Military history: Baltic states / European / Russian & Soviet / World War II B‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

B

This article has been rated as B-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Baltic states military history task force
	European military history task force
	Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force
	World War II task force

Title[edit]

I don't think that this title is the best, I would suggest renaming it to at least Lithuanian partisans 1944-1953. M.K. (talk) 12:54, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I do not see any reason why there is a Latvian national partisans and Lithunaian nationalistic partisans. Most probably it would be better to name both of the articles Organised anti-Soviet Resistance - Lithuanian and Latvian, and also Estonian - as it is called in the accademic monographs.--Lokyz (talk) 00:21, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

uniformed[edit]

If this [1] is supposed to be about the fact that they wore military uniforms in accordance with international law, then that fact probably belongs in the third paragraph of the lede. "Uniformed guerrilla warfare" just sounds weird in English. Volunteer Marek 21:42, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The formula may be corrected - it was intended only to stress the units status as Combatants. --Lokyz (talk) 15:17, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bunker of lith partisans.jpg Nominated for Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Bunker of lith partisans.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests April 2012

What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Bunker of lith partisans.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 01:11, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal[edit]

This page was originally The Lithuanian nationalist partisans 1944-1953, however it is now during and after World War II. It thus makes no sense for there to be the small article Lithuanian partisans (1941). Ronhjones ^(Talk) 21:56, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Strongest oppose & speedy remove of tag. Two very different topics, but I see how they can be confusing. 1941 is about collaborations with the nazis, 1944-1953 is about resistance against the soviets. Renata (talk) 22:21, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Lithuanian partisans. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:57, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Citation Needed[edit]

Hello! A citation needed tag was recently added to the page regarding Lithuanian resistance to recruitment efforts. The links for the sources cited led to 404 pages, so after a short amount of digging I located the now-archived articles and updated the links. I have also removed the citation needed tag as the sources do describe Lithuanian resistance, and in comparison to Estonia and Latvia, specifically. Please let me know if I made any mistakes in the updates, and how I can improve if I did, thanks! King keudo (talk) 16:39, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sources used for resistance to German occupation[edit]

Firstly, they are used to say that Lithuanians strongly opposed German attempts at conscription. But the first source says:

"This defense force was to be under the command of Lithuanians and was intended to operate in Lithuanian territory. Under these conditions, the resistance endorsed the force. Surprisingly, about 20,000 volunteers, twice the requirement, appeared at recruitment points"

In addition, the earlier points at which it argues that there was resistance to recuritment have scant citations. For example, "One German official, Major General Just, succeeded in forming several construction battalions. Despite Soviet allegations, these battalions were composed of draftees, not volunteers; the battalions did not indicate public support for Nazism." (No citation follows)

The second source: "The councilors retorted well to the demands. First of all, the councilors were not legally competent to conscript the nation because they were not a constitutional body with such rights. Second, the Lithuanians knew very well that Lithuania was occupied. They would not listen to the orders of a foreign influenced, unconstitutional administration." (No citation follows)

Thirdly, perhaps most importantly, it seems very biased. Biased language is used very very frequently, for example: "However, the German manpower managers in Berlin did not take into account the fiercely independent nature of the Lithuanians." (very academic and verifiable claims!!) There is also parts of the article that say that the oppression of the Nazis was near identical to the Soviet's. Equating political and economic repression (as the source itself says, the deportations attacked primarily political targets (politicans, policemen, prison guards, etc..) and economic targets (bussiness owners and landlords and such),with the Holocaust and Nazi-led genocide is very suspicous and necesarily devalues the source. Genabab (talk) 13:14, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]