Talk:List of unusual deaths/Archive 15

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 10 ← Archive 13 Archive 14 Archive 15

Does this death merit inclusion?

Does this death merit inclusion? This recent death has been described as a "freak accident":

Thanks. Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 03:02, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

Thoughts? Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 00:42, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
In this case yes. The second source says that after falling to the ice he was cut on the neck by the skate of another player, which is rather unusual even in this sport. I'm more concerned about the Parvat Gala Baria case who died after a snakebite which is mundane, and a few others. Brandmeistertalk 09:20, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
The text in the first since (as well as the headline) says: "The Connecticut high school hockey player who died in a freak accident on the ice during a game was identified Friday..." So this meets the criterion agreed at the RfC: "...the clear policy based consensus is to keep this list only to those deaths for whom there are reliable sources (as noted by one person, these need to be high quality sources, not tabloid journals who regularly fling around these words for fun) that the death is in someway exceptional." The second source does not meet this criterion. Martinevans123 (talk) 09:30, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
Thanks. Well, both sources are -- pretty much -- saying the exact same thing. They are describing the accident / incident / death. One source just happens to use the phrase "freak accident" ... and one source just happens not to. I don't think our consensus is that "pedantic" and nit-picky ... or is it? I am not particularly familiar with this specific article. Thanks. Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 18:01, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
They are very similar sources, but one has the required synonym for "unusual" and the other does not. I think the outcome of the RfC was deliberately pedantic. It may not be a really logical or scientific criterion. It's just a necessary line in the sand so that it can be easily implemented. Martinevans123 (talk) 18:46, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
Thanks. I just added the entry for Teddy Balkind on January 6, 2022. If I were to look, I am sure that I can find many sources that use the "magic words" (e.g., "freak accident"). I found two, immediately. But, I think requiring specific "magic words" is a silly way to determine whether an entry / death belongs on this page. Nonetheless, I added Balkind's death on January 6, 2022. There are two very reliable / reputable sources that describe the death as a "freak accident". Thanks. Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 18:53, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
Many other suggestions were made at the RfC for criteria that may have been less "silly". This was the only one that eventually gained consensus. Many participants wanted the article to be binned altogether as being "untenable". Maybe we're due for another RfC. But things have been remarkably calm here for several years now. Martinevans123 (talk) 19:00, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for all of your comments, input, and insights. As I said ... I am quite unfamiliar with this page ... its inner workings ... and its "behind-the-scenes" operations. So, I never participated in -- nor read -- that Consensus RfC Page. I assume there were good arguments on all sides ... and that this was the "best compromise" arrived at. No, not perfect ... but, it has its merits. It is "easily" implemented. And, more importantly, -- as you stated -- things have been remarkably calm here for several years now. That's important. I am not here to "upset the apple cart". I just wanted to add my two cents. Overall, I don't see any changes needed for now. Thanks again! Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 19:13, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
Many thanks for explaining, Joseph. Yes, it is a bit of a dog's breakfast. But seems to work for now. There's also this holding area for items that may be in doubt or lacking suitable sources. Martinevans123 (talk) 19:18, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

Ten people death (November 21 2016) listed in the page. Supplementary Information

The first source identify one of the 10 victims : Clarence Leo. I put it here. I don't know if this merit a change in the "name" column of this entry ? Gimly24 (talk) 21:45, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

In fact, we know 2 other victims names, sex and age. Apollo Papadopoulos, Male, 35 years and Omar-Jamil Moujalled, Male, 18 years (https://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-06-25/thunderstorm-asthma-inquest-victims-cardiac-arrest/9907120) Gimly24 (talk) 21:49, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
And this source gives the identity of a 4th person : Hope Carnevali, 20 years old women (https://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-11-27/sixth-person-dies-from-thunderstorm-asthma-emergency/8061380) Gimly24 (talk) 21:54, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanplh/article/PIIS2542-5196(18)30120-7/fulltext (This study reveals that the gender ratios of the victims was 3 ♀ and 7 ♂) Gimly24 (talk) 21:59, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

Tyre Sampson

I'm not sure Tyre Sampson should be included. While deaths at amusement parks are statistically rare, I don't think they inherently qualify as unusual. No other amusement park deaths appear to be listed. I'm also not sure one can call any death unusual until an investigation is able to be conducted into the death and the circumstances surrounding it. Pastel143 (talk) 05:40, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

Two possible Simons?

Should both Simon Peter and Simon the zealot be listed on here? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.170.61.95 (talk) 20:14, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

Nick Navarro

I have deleted the good faith addition of Nick Navarro (died 28 November 1978). Neither the cited New York Times article nor the St. Petersburg Times article or the passage from American Desperado cited in the Calder Casino article describe Navarro's death as "strange", "bizarre", "unusual", etc. (The link from the Calder Casino article to a Palm Beach Post story results in a 404 error.) Moreover, Navarro was not struck by lightning while on a horse (which would possibly have killed the horse as well); he was jogging across the track at the time. Gildir (talk) 10:58, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

Just for info: "In the UK in the past 30 years (1987-2016), 58 people were known to have been killed by lightning, that is, on average, two people per year.": [1]. 11:03, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

Wynn Alan Bruce

None of the sources that are visible (one is paywalled) describe the death as "unusual", which is the only criterion for inclusion in this article. Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 18:21, 26 April 2022 (UTC) p.s. also struggling to see any claims for how often it occurs at Self-immolation

I found In Buddhism, the ascetic practice of self-immolation -- where one voluntarily takes their own life, typically by setting themselves ablaze -- is extremely rare; it's a controversial practice among some adherents of the Mahayana tradition of the religion (emphasis mine), but that same article also states that More than 100 Tibetans have set themselves on fire since 2009 to protest Chinese rule. Apart from those countries, it's a practice that has claimed the lives of hundreds (perhaps even thousands) of activists in India, South Korea and even Kurds protesting in Western Europe, according to sociologist Michael Biggs. The only other source I could find that even came close is this one, which states that Self-immolations in the US are rare but not entirely unheard of... (emphasis mine).
With all this, I'd say it doesn't belong on the page, but if anyone else can find a better source, I'm all ears! NekoKatsun (nyaa) 19:25, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
I have to agree. But some good material there for Self-immolation. I think we need to see a response from User:Antibubbles, even if they have made a grand total of only 31 edits since 2005? Martinevans123 (talk) 20:11, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
I went ahead and took it out. Self-immolation is not unusual. We have an article on it and it's quite usual that one dies when they intentionally set themselves on fire. Prinsgezinde (talk) 10:46, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
If anyone could find sources that describe it as "unusual", it could be re-added. Martinevans123 (talk) 12:11, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
I agree with that general condition, but should we not also apply common sense in some of these cases? If someone drowns in a pool (with no other peculiarities) and some article decides to call that a "freak accident" even though it happens quite often, would that really be enough? Prinsgezinde (talk) 22:04, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
There may be varying degrees of "common sense" that might be fairly applied in any determination, but the RfC decided that a description of "unusual" in some RS source(s) was the only criterion, as described at the top of this page. Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 22:11, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

Primary source tag

I have to say that I agree with the editor who placed the primary sourcing tag on this page. Many of the more recent "unusual" deaths are sourced to lamentably poor tabloid news sources, and not subjected to the proper analysis that constitutes a secondary source. Such analysis would examine whether or not a freak accident is actually unique or at least rare. Tabloid sources violate WP:NOTNEWS, which is a policy. There are quite a number of bad entries on this list which must be removed until better sourcing is provided. It is not the duty of editors who challenge poorly sourced material to provide some sort of proof, per WP:BURDEN. Abductive (reasoning) 02:55, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Question

What should I do if I want to add a death but the person is only known by their initials? He was an Asian-American activist who accidentally killed himself with a sharpened flagpole during a protest: he stabbed himself in the neck. --62.165.249.126 (talk) 17:05, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

Initials are fine. Some entries do not have any name. You just sources that describe the death as "unusual" etc. Martinevans123 (talk) 17:30, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

Gilbert Tinoso

I propose to remove Gilbert Tinoso's accident. Pinging reverters @NekoKatsun: @HelloAnnyong:

"Gilbert Tinoso, 38, died in Burbank, California after the spare wheel from an oncoming cement truck in the opposite stretch of the freeway broke loose and struck the cab of his Toyota Tacoma."

The reliable source does say it is a 'freak accident', but aren't us Wikipedia editors allowed to make our own judgement instead of blindly listening what the reporter says?

Here's what I found while browsing "wheel loose killed".

Motorcyclist killed by loose wheel on Highway 1 near Revelstoke (Jul 2022)

Man killed after collision with wheel from oncoming vehicle Thursday night (Des 2021)

Woman Killed by Tire Flying Off Truck Ahead of Her (Mar 2021)

Man killed by loose wheel on Highway 401 (Aug 2020)

Gray woman killed after loose tire flies off truck, hits car (Aug 2019)

'The next moment she was gone': Loose tires deadly no matter the size (May 2019)

Woman killed by loose wheel on I-40 (Oct 2018)

100-pound semi wheel hub comes loose, kills pregnant mother of 3 in Illinois (Mar 2018, a wheel hub)

Loose trailer wheel kills Pittsburgh motorcyclist (Aug 2014)

Man killed after loose wheel smashes car on I-93 (Sep 2011)

Tennessee woman struck, killed by loose wheel (May 2006)

And these are only the ones happened in North America, and only the quite recent ones. How about hundreds of other countries, especially non-English? How about from >20 years ago? How about non-wheel debris? It's freak, but not uncommon. No reason to list Tinoso's death here. Geanard (talk) 12:14, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

A freak accident is, quite literally, one that is unusual or occurs in unusual circumstances. There's been a lot of scuffling on the talkpage here historically about whether a particular death 'qualifies' or not, and the important bit from the RfC lives up at the top of the talkpage:
We have a source calling it a freak accident, IAR should not be applied, thus there is no policy-based reason to remove the death. NekoKatsun (nyaa) 14:52, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
To clarify, the fact that you reverted it is not procedurally wrong, I just invited you to this discussion because maybe you would have an opinion on it. So does the fact that the death is included because the source says a freak accident. But I'm currently protesting it based on the reasons I've given (with evidence).
To add an argument, if someone for example added 20 deaths by flying wheels with proper sources that said these are freak accidents, which is possible with Tinoso's death included which creates a precedent, I don't think it will be a proper addition due to the large quantity of cases. Geanard (talk) 17:03, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
I agree that swathes of similar deaths would create clutter, but please note that at the moment, that's not what's happening (and historically is quite rare for this page - the vast majority of additions are one-offs and far more likely to be improperly sourced). In the event of a situation like that, we'd have to have a full-fledged RfC to establish consensus, I suppose.
My understanding of your position - and please correct me if I'm wrong - is that Tinoso's death should be excluded because other people have died by being struck with road debris, including wheels that come off of other vehicles. However, it's been long established that the deaths here don't need to be unique, just unusual, and that the standard for "unusual" is that a reliable source refers to it as such. I wouldn't debate that other people have indeed been killed by road debris (there used to be another one on this very page, killed by a cat's eye reflector), but it's still weird that it happens. NekoKatsun (nyaa) 17:35, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

Addition

Added Henry II of France to the list of unusual deaths of the Renaissance. I have taken the paragraph from the section Death in the main article about Henry II of France. 193.147.165.68 (talk) 11:32, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

Seattle crane deaths

I added two deaths related to a crane collapse that occured in Seattle in 2019. The deaths I added were of two people who were sitting in traffic when the crane collapsed on them. I did not add the deaths of the two crane opperators.

It was reverted. How come?

The Seattle Times article I cited quotes an expert as saying that this sort of accident is "extremely rare". Doesn't this meet the criteria here? https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:List_of_unusual_deaths&oldid=587040688#RfC:_What_qualifies? Rafael 01:44, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

Perhaps @Pbritti: can explain -Neøn (talk) 21:16, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for pinging! Strictly speaking, I reverted the edits on two grounds: that rarity is not synonymous with unusualness and the far more secondary MOS issue with the source being copied-and-pasted across the deaths (which should have been a single entry with a single use of the reference). An example for the first point: fatal great white shark attacks are rare and most reliable sources on such attack will note them as such, but they are not typically described as "unusual" (with exceptions, of course). We have entries on other predatory animals killing humans, but generally there's an unusual context in which they occur (such as a woman dismissing the likelihood of such an event shortly prior and joking about it during her fatal encounter). The not-a-consensus-consensus on policy application that describes what should go on this page makes it clear that the event itself must be unusual and described with synonymous terms. If another editor with experience on placing entries on this page believes the expert analysis of rarity reflects the event being "unusual", I'll defer to their judgement. ~ Pbritti (talk) 21:47, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Perhaps a more pertinent example of something on this page more approximating the crane incident is the fairly recent death of a pregnant woman crushed by a falling concrete block. My initial judgement would be to exclude this entry as well (neither cited source uses a word translating to "unusual" or synonym thereof; "unfortunate" is used). ~ Pbritti (talk) 21:53, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Should this be added?

There's a court document from 1995 from Papua New Guinea thats details two male deaths in 1994 from injuries to their testicles, one from being kicked, and the other from having it squeezed hard enough. They died from neurogenic shock and severe pain. Both deaths occurred when they attacked women who fought back in self-defense, and their cases are unrelated. The source, State v Moro; State v Bamire, says that the circumstances of their deaths are "unusual and dangerous form of killing" and "This kind of killing is unusual" (text is a bit garbled in the source but I fixed it). This article says that for a death to be included its needed a source calling it unusual or a synonym thereof.

I don't know if this type of death is common or not, so I might ask someone here for suggestion to whether include it or not. 45.234.155.146 (talk) 01:26, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

No, as the court document is a primary source. If you find a source matching the standards laid out in the Wikipedia policy for reliable sources and it refers to the deaths as "unusual" (or some synonym thereof/in a word that translates to "unusual"), then yes, that would almost certainly qualify. In any case, ouch! ~ Pbritti (talk) 02:02, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Thomas Anthony Mansfield's Caffeine Overdose

The paragraph for Thomas Anthony Mansfield includes "Mansfield's scale, which he was using to measure the powder, could only weigh between 2,000 milligrams (2.0 g) and 5,000 milligrams (5.0 g), causing him to miscalculate and ingest an equivalent of two hundred cups of coffee."

However, this doesn't quite make sense, as a cup of coffee has roughly 100mg of caffeine. The BBC article this is sourced from also mentions a two hundred cups of coffee equivalent which appears estimated by the amount of caffeine in his blood. Maybe he assumed his scale topped out at 50mg and eyeballed a 4x dose? That's the best explanation I can come up with, but that isn't quite what one would assume from an initial reading of the text. 92.202.143.102 (talk) 14:54, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

inclusion of trevor moore

does anyone think we should add trevor moore? he got drunk and fell of a balcony in the middle of the night, and asked to be refferred to as a sexpot in his will.

in addition, many of his skits joked about a world running conspiracy in the standard style, and as such an unusual death has been refferred to as a joke about the conspiracy killing him to keep the truth. i think this is more unusual than some deaths on this list. DParkinson1 (talk) 20:51, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

Falling off a balcony onto your head, while drunk and on drugs, doesn't sound very unusual. It doesn't matter what you think, just like it doesn't matter what I think. You just need some sources that describe his death as "unusual". I don't see any. 86.187.163.77 (talk) 21:37, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
What a rude and absurd reply. His death was most certainly unusual and many of these individuals do not have source citations. 107.10.129.126 (talk) 02:31, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

Inclusion of Titan submersible?

Given the confirmed deaths of the five passengers about the Titan submersible, it'd be prudent to include the incident onto the list.

Here's at least one article calling it unusual or a synonym thereof. If more are need, I haven't seen them and no doubt believe they can be found.

2603:8000:E503:153E:8C53:DD5C:A867:407 (talk) 19:11, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

The New York Post is not a reliable source (and is generally referred to as a tabloid; also it misquotes Stephenson, he said losing contact is unusual, not the sub itself). LA Times is better, but that link is to a commentary piece about social media (said piece is also outdated, factually incorrect, and only refers to the media circus as bizarre, not the sub). I agree that it's entirely possible that the incident will ultimately qualify, but it would be prudent to wait until the frenzy has calmed somewhat and major news outlets have had the chance to create more in-depth writeups. One could just as easily argue that there's nothing at all unusual about five people ultimately dying from an uninspected submersible with "some elements of MacGyvery jerry-rigged-ness" imploding. NekoKatsun (nyaa) 19:51, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
"NY Post is not a reliable source" lol - is that your opinion or has it been deprecated? 107.10.129.126 (talk) 02:32, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
It's been deprecated. I know better than to use my opinions on Wikipedia. :) NekoKatsun (nyaa) 02:33, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

Is -Norbert Tóth (29 May 2023)- worthy of an entry in this article?

this entry is about someone dying of a heart attack, I don't think that's unusual at all. Osw719 (talk) 21:05, 11 July 2023 (UTC)

I don't speak Hungarian, so I can't verify if the source refers to the death as unusual. That's the standard (what the source says), regardless of what us editors think. NekoKatsun (nyaa) 21:40, 11 July 2023 (UTC)

Titan Submarine victims

Should we add the Titan Submarine victims? It is a very unusual/rare death and was highly publicised. 2601:2C7:67F:C8F0:603D:EB6B:F092:5C2A (talk) 21:08, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

There's a section about this already - short version is, we need a reliable source that calls their deaths unusual. NekoKatsun (nyaa) 00:01, 17 July 2023 (UTC)

Add Owen Hart

Owen Hart has had one of the most unfortunate deaths. His death occurred while Owen was performing as the Blue Blazer. Since this was some sort of superhero gimmick, they would have him be lowered into the ring from a harness. But, on May 23, 1999 at the WWF Over The Edge PPV, he was supposed to be lowered down to the ring by the harness. This time, the harness snapped and caused him to fall all the way down into the wrestling ring, nearly hitting a referee. At 8:22 P.M., his death was announced by Jim Ross, an announcer that worked for the WWF at the time. Truly a terrible accident that should’ve never happened. HimynameisAndre (talk) 10:36, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

Article from CNN: http://www.cnn.com/US/9905/24/wrestler.dies.04/ HimynameisAndre (talk) 10:53, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
We need a reliable source that calls the death explicitly unusual (or similar - bizarre, freakish, rare, etc.). If you can find one, I see no reason why Hart's death couldn't be included.
If memory serves, the superhero angle was also supposed to be slightly incompetent, so the original plan was for him to release from the harness just above the ground and pratfall the last couple of feet. This necessitated a quick release harness, but something happened to trigger the release early, hence the 70-someodd foot fall onto the top rope. NekoKatsun (nyaa) 14:02, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
https://bleacherreport.com/articles/2072366-bret-hart-jeff-jarrett-and-more-reminisce-on-owen-hart-15-years-after-his-death
Refers to the incident as "bizarre" and "incomprehensible" if that's close enough? 80.47.229.192 (talk) 18:11, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
I know it's what the source says, but it's not really "incomprehensible", is it? Because simply... "a wire holding him in the air either broke or became disconnected while he was being lowered into the ring". Simple as. I suppose "bizarre" is good enough, except that the use of the word "incomprehensible" kind of casts doubt on that source? It certainly sounds unusual. 86.187.171.22 (talk) 19:20, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
Current consensus seems to be that Bleacher Report is not a reliable source; Since abandoning the content farm model in 2010, Bleacher Report has been the subject of continued criticism for its exploitation of unpaid contributors, its blanket policy prohibiting writers from breaking their own news, and its high-volume production of low-quality, search-optimized slideshow content. Looks like it's all self-published content. NekoKatsun (nyaa) 16:48, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Think I definitely understand the argument that it's not all that unusual - it's about as unusual as a circus tiger going nuts and killing its handler. It's not supposed to happen, it's not part of the show, but it does happen. Except in all of the wrestling matches ever put on, how many wrestlers died in the ring from a demonstrably freak accident, in demonstrably unique circumstances. Owen's death is one of a kind from a certain regard. I appreciate that this is conjecture for the most part and that isn't the Wikipedia way, but think for a second if there are any high profile comparable incidents?
Also, when we're looking at reliability of sources, who is qualified to say what is an unusual death? Only someone that has done the necessary research through global death records into how common that method of death is and has come to the statistical conclusion that this death has a rarity to it.
Do we really hold every death on this article to that strict standard? Or is it all conjecture to a degree? Is Owen Hart's death less unusual than Rasputin for example, who is on this list? He was shot to death after a failed poisoning attempt, and his body dumped in a river. People are poisoned, shot and drowned every day 80.47.229.192 (talk) 18:09, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
All reasonable questions. Most wrestlers don't get lowered into the ring like a circus act. Your second point is even more pertinent. But the list here (currently) uses only one criterion - that a WP:RS reliable source describes the death as "unusual" or a synonym of that (see top of this page). Yes, Rasputin is included, of course - plenty of sources available. Thanks. 86.187.228.204 (talk) 18:35, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
(edit conflict) Per the notice at the top of this talkpage, the clear policy based consensus is to keep this list only to those deaths for whom there are reliable sources (as noted by one person, these need to be high quality sources, not tabloid journals who regularly fling around these words for fun) that the death is in someway exceptional. It's not a matter of whose death is more or less unusual, and it's not necessarily a matter of statistical rarity; some deaths are 'common' (poisoned, shot, drowned, as you say), but the circumstances and reporting point out that there's something unusual about them (can you name a case other than Rasputin where all three happened at once?).
By the same token, people fall from heights every day, wrestlers die in the ring with depressing frequency, and stunts go wrong all the time; what would make Hart's death unusual is that it's all three at once. We need a source that says that, though; any conjecture accepted here should only be on the part of the source, not us editors.
The key thing to remember is that we do not decide what's unusual. We only report what other sources say. If we think something might be unusual, we can go looking for sources, but that's about it. NekoKatsun (nyaa) 18:44, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
It wasn't really "all three at once", was it? And happens all the time in Saint Petersburg anyway, lol. 86.187.228.204 (talk) 18:57, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
https://www.si.com/.amp/wrestling/2019/05/23/wwe-owen-hart-death-20th-anniversary
All points have been taken on board. I was the one who discussed comparing to Rasputin etc so I'll give this one more try and then leave it as reliable source material is proving hard to come by.
Sports Illustrated any good as a source?? TIA 2A00:23C1:EF00:4301:A150:8CF:4935:8D7D (talk) 08:25, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
This is perfect. I've gone ahead and added him to the list, supported by this source. Thank you for finding it! NekoKatsun (nyaa) 14:26, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

Unclear wording in the Joemar Jungco section?

The article currently says "half his body from the head down to the waist was stuck into a meat grinder" whereas the source makes it seem like the wording should be "half his body from the head down to the waist was pulled into a meat grinder" as his hand got caught first and the machine pulled the rest of him in. Not too big of a deal, but the "stuck" version makes it seem to me like he was pushed into the machine (like "stuck a fork in the outlet" to continue the morbidness.) 174.45.135.223 (talk) 01:22, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

I agree completely, and have made the change you suggested.
Also, holy cow, I was not expecting a picture of it when I clicked through to check the source! Fair warning for anyone else, I guess, there's a black and white photo of the poor guy's legs sticking out of the machine. Yeesh. NekoKatsun (nyaa) 14:52, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
My apologies, I should have warned you but I’d been reading this page for too long and I guess I got a bit desensitized. 174.45.135.223 (talk) 03:37, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
Oh no worries at all, I'm not upset, just surprised. I suppose I'm more used to 'slightly distant picture of the building with police tape', 'recent smiling picture of the victim', and occasionally 'picture of ambulance with stretcher visible'. Thank you for your concern, though! NekoKatsun (nyaa) 14:50, 26 July 2023 (UTC)

Guy that died in a cave

I forget his name but he died in a cave in Utah. Very bizarre death. Should be added. 107.10.129.126 (talk) 02:33, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

Are you referring to Nutty Putty Cave? Sadly, spelunkers getting stuck and dying happens far more often than it should, but if you can find reliable third-party sources that call the death unusual or some synonym thereof, you're welcome to add it. NekoKatsun (nyaa) 02:41, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Yes, I am refering to the Nutty Putty Cave incident. Not sure why jokers are making jokes down below. This most definitely constitutes an "unusual death". 107.10.129.126 (talk) 07:56, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
If this is talking about “snakebitmgee”, The YouTuber that ended up missing. He was in Nevada when he went missing and it isn’t confirmed that he is dead. They found his camera and phone next to an abandoned mine (I think it was). His wife determined that he committed suicide because he battled depression for several years. HimynameisAndre (talk) 10:50, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
That was Kenny Veach in 2014. But it wasn't his wife, who said "I believe he committed suicide"? It was "the woman claiming to be his girlfriend." Was there ever an inquest? But falling down a mineshaft would have probably been less unusual than being abducted by aliens in Area 51. 86.187.171.22 (talk) 19:32, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
What about that girl that fell in the well.... Jennifer something? This was a while ago... did she die? That would be kind of unusual I guess? Or maybe she's still down there, I don't know, I haven't seen anything about it for a while. Herostratus (talk) 19:56, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
Seems she is now aged 37. But what about that large rotund guy? That was also a while ago... he allegedly fell from a substantial fortification... did he die? I believe the incident involved cavalry and foot soldiers belong to a famous monarch. That would be kind of unusual I guess? Or maybe he's still in pieces, I don't know, I haven't seen anything about it for a while. Humpty something, I think. 86.187.171.22 (talk) 20:07, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

Vulture getting hit by a space shuttle

I think that a vulture getting hit by a space shuttle launch would be considered quite unusual. However, I only found one source that covered this beyond a single sentence (and even that was from NASA themselves). In addition to this, I also found no reliable sources confirming nor denying that this was fatal for the vulture. If we could find more sources and verify that it was fatal to the vulture, I think it would make a great addition. Horizon206 (talk) 01:59, 6 August 2023 (UTC)

It's worth mentioning that not only is a source needed confirming the incident was fatal, but also that that source must describe the death as "unusual" - or some synonym thereof. That is the criterion for inclusion. Wikipedian's opinions don't cut it, however unusual it may seem. Cheers! Captainllama (talk) 01:07, 10 August 2023 (UTC)

Pyrrhus of Epirus and Henry I of Castile

Henry I is featured on the article, whilst Pyrrhus is not, despite them both being killed by a roofing tile. We ought to include neither or both, considering how similar their deaths are. I personally think both should be included. 194.223.41.155 (talk) 12:59, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

The standard for inclusion is that a reliable source call the death unusual (or some synonym thereof). If you have such a source for Pyrrhus, by all means, feel free to add it! NekoKatsun (nyaa) 14:40, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

Titan Submersible

The Titan submersible has been out of the news cycle for a while and I think there is some good sources for it. There are 2 mentions of it in the talk page which I think were not accepted because there were sources that did not call it unusual. Just for clarification does a source need to explicitly state that a death is unusual or can it just be inferred. Wren (talk) 23:39, 11 September 2023 (UTC)

I feel as if it is an original synthesis to call it unusual if there are no sources which describe it that way. Panamitsu (talk) Please ping on reply 23:57, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Longstanding consensus here is that a death must be explicitly referred to by reliable sources as "unusual" or some synonym thereof. Inference won't cut it I'm afraid. Cheers! Captainllama (talk) 00:15, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

Tetsu Shiohara

I question whether this person belongs on the list. Hundreds of people die in falls every year. What makes this death "unique or extremely rare"? CodeTalker (talk) 23:45, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

Typo?

English is not my mothertongue, so I'm not sure whether "round" is a typo or not:

"He was dragged round the walls with sacks of earth and stone on his back"

Shouldn't it be "around" instead? Nakonana (talk) 10:34, 18 November 2023 (UTC)

Probably, so I have changed it. Although I think "dragged around" and "dragged round" are often used interchangeably. "Dragged round" might be seen as slightly more colloquial? There are similar verbs: "go round", "move round", "travel round", "sail round", etc., which can typically be used in both forms. Martinevans123 (talk) 10:49, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
Ok, thanks for confirming, and thanks for the additional information on similar verbs, such information is really helpful for a non-native speaker! :) Nakonana (talk) 11:50, 18 November 2023 (UTC)

Bird killed by pitch at Chase field yet again

https://www.cnn.com/2023/05/18/sport/zac-gallen-bird-killed-by-pitch-mlb-intl-spt/index.html

a second bird is killed at Chase field. Coincidentally, the previous time this happened to the Diamondbacks, the Diamondbacks made it to the World Series just as they did this year. 63.151.199.50 (talk) 17:37, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

Yes, the source says it was "... a sad and unusual feat..." So could be added. Martinevans123 (talk) 17:46, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:List_of_unusual_deaths/Archive_15&oldid=1222746473"