Talk:List of rail yards

Trains Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Is this list complete? Furthermore what does the "number of tracks" actually refer to - number of total tracks in the station yard or number of tracks actually in use? For example Čierna nad Tisou railway station has over 900 tracks and is listed here as having "21 + 16". - filelake shoe  14:47, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Adding pages for former and future rail yards[edit]

Since this article is for current rail yards, should there be pages for former or future rail yards? TheLegoCat (talk) 23:04, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of rail yards. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160531092442/http://news.huochepiao.com/2016-4/316558.htm to http://news.huochepiao.com/2016-4/316558.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:43, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What happened to SC & SD?[edit]

What happened to the information for South Carolina and South Dakota? That used to be there. 2604:CA00:1D8:4EE5:0:0:1260:A565 (talk) 08:06, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]