Talk:List of Upstairs, Downstairs (1971 TV series) characters

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the British television task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hazels Death[edit]

Hazel dies, aged 32, Is her age true ?

In the German Version you can't get this information. --AndreaMimi (talk) 18:03, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Removed redlink to characters[edit]

I have removed the {{main article}} links for characters such as; Rose, Emily, Edward and Mrs. Bridges. They were all redlinks except for Rose Buck and her main page was only one sentence long and contained less information that her entry on this page does. I have made redirect back to here for all of them. It is unlikely that these would have been expanded or created, and if they are, they can be readded. fr33k man ^-simpleWP- 14:45, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Death Dates[edit]

How would it be known when people died if those times were far in the future of the respective series? What is this information based on? It sounds made up to me, so I removed the suspect dates. Unless a reference is provided it should not be replaced. If some canonical source says otherwise, I apologize, but please provide the relevant reference.72.76.226.140 (talk) 13:55, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What on earth.... ?!?![edit]

... do the numbers under "first season" and "last season" mean??? There is no explanation whatsoever. Is it their shoe size? Number of deductions on their W-2? I'm glad if it's obvious to some people, but not to everyone. Whatever those numbers are, it needs to be stated, or they need to be deleted.72.76.226.140 (talk) 13:47, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I think I have it. The series in which they first appeared and last appeared. Very poor headings. I'll alter it. 72.76.226.140 (talk) 13:49, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment moved from article[edit]

I removed the comments below. Maybe someone can make use of them. Josh Milburn (talk) 00:54, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lady Prudence had only a few lines during Georginas wedding,regarding most of Londons society were present and Sir Geoffrey Dillon would have lost most of his clients. She may also have made a comment regarding a guest that looked like she had fruitlike on her head.

On watching Episode 1 of the revised 2010 series, we are told the property had been bought many years ago but never lived in. It had been bought by the inheriter who had just married. The silver tea pot may well have been left to Rose by Lord or Lady Bellamy as Rose went to live and work with them when they moved following the 'sale' although a sale is never made clear. Given the speed in which the house was packed up, it was probably put up for sale with vacant possession.. this would have been in approx 1929-1930 after the big crash when James lost all of his money, as his mother had left the house to him and he had left debts The house, therefore had to be sold to pay off James's debts.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of Upstairs, Downstairs (1971 TV series) characters. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061013153244/http://www.updown.org.uk/woman1.pdf to http://www.updown.org.uk/woman1.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:00, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Needs editing work[edit]

The composition (grammar, syntax, phrasing, word choice, punctuation, and so on) of this entire article needs a very great deal of work. No, I am not going to do the work myself, so do not suggest it. I learned long ago not to mess with amateur editors on Wikipedia (I am a professional book editor). I am simply pointing out that the text of the article needs a considerable amount of work to lift it above the level of a high school essay attempt. DesertSkies120 (talk) 23:32, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]