This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
This article is supported by WikiProject Mythology. This project provides a central approach to Mythology-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the WikiProject page for more details.MythologyWikipedia:WikiProject MythologyTemplate:WikiProject MythologyMythology articles
Why is Styx in the list of the Oceanids, but Lethe in the list of Potamoi? It seems to be quite inconsistent. Michael! (talk) 12:58, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
(@Markx121993:) I think numbering the table entries makes little sense. I see no real benefit, and it makes additions (or deletions) to the table difficult. I think that column should be removed. Paul August☎ 19:10, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Ok I will delete the numbering sequence.--Markx121993 (talk) 00:52, 22 April 2017 (UTC) (Copied from my talk pagePaul August☎ 10:48, 22 April 2017 (UTC))[reply]
(@Markx121993:) Thanks. I know you've but a lot of hard work into this table, and I thank you for that, but I have some other more serious concerns as well. It is most important that everything in the table is well sourced. In particular, I think the column of meanings of names with no sources is a serious problem. We need to either source each name's meaning, or delete it. The rest of the data needs sourcing as well, but much of it is probably included in the sources allready given, but this needs to be verified, not an easy task, and probably what should happen is each of those entries have their own sourcing added (a lot more work I know). These problems (and the required work) could be eliminated, or reduced, if we didn't try to include all this information in the table, and instead made sure that the individual Oceanid articles contained that information (with sources) instead, this would be much less work, and much easier, since most of this info will already be in the individual articles, and given the inherent difficulties involved in editing tables (as I'm sure you've become aware!) Another problem with including all this information here, is that it makes what was a relatively small and easy to display table, now rather unwieldy and difficult to display—especially on small screens!. Paul August☎ 11:20, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
As these issues have not been adressed, I've decided to delete the table until they are. Paul August☎ 22:20, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
