Talk:Linda Martell/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: SNUGGUMS (talk · contribs) 03:35, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


I'll take this one. Expect initial comments within a few days. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 03:35, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Let's begin with infobox and lead section assessments.

Infobox[edit]

  • File:Linda Martell.jpg has subpar lighting where Linda's hair blends in with the background. I recommend using something else.
  • Using "1974" seems misleading when she hasn't entirely left music, even if much of her activity since then has been non-musical.

Lead[edit]

  • Don't use genre in opening sentence as you've currently done. It would be better to just say "an American singer" before using subsequent sentences to discuss the type of music she has worked with.
  • The producer from "an introduction to a producer who signed her to his Nashville label" should be mentioned by name, and same goes for "manager" from "a series of business conflicts with her manager"
  • "Over the next several decades she lived in various states" seems like it's missing a comma after "decades"
  • "switched careers"..... be specific

I'll be back with more later. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 03:34, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Early years[edit]

  • Are the names of her siblings known?
  • The use of "but" from "She sang gospel music at church but was also drawn to country music" makes it sound like these interests are mutually exclusive, which isn't the case, so I'd use "and" instead.
  • This doesn't say anything about "The Angelos" at all, though it does mention birth city unlike what you've currently used for such detail
  • "Local DJ, Charles “Big Saul” Greene"..... A local DJ known as, and use straight quotation marks (",') instead of curly ones (”,’) per MOS:CURLY

The rest will probably be done section-by-section. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 00:50, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Career[edit]

1962–69: R&B beginnings and musical shift[edit]

  • Four digits are preferred for years as more complete and professional than two digits
  • While this does mention that "A Little Tear (Was Falling from My Eyes)" didn't get promoted, it doesn't say or even suggest that this was why it wasn't successful. Just note its lack of success without bringing in an unsupported implication.
  • "Despite limited success" gives a false impression that success levels have anything to do with performance frequency (people can play music live without making much or any money from that)
  • Move File:Linda Martell--Ebony.jpg towards the top of this subsection so it doesn't leak into the next one. On another note, I'm not seeing any copyright issues with it.

Up next will be the 1969–1974 period. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 00:25, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

1969–74: Country music success[edit]

  • See my previous comment on four digits vs. two digits
  • No qualms with File:Linda Martell--Opry 2.jpg
  • The use of "hit" from and "pop hit", "became a hit", and "crossover hit" is subpar tone. It also sounds misleading to base this assessment off of a component chart ranking unless it also did well on a nation's primary chart (which is what represents overall popularity within a territory)
  • Capitalize the "m" for AllMusic
  • This does give a chart peak, but says nothing about when "Bad Case of the Blues" was released.
    • @SNUGGUMS: I added the reference from a book that covers that.
  • There's an extra space between the period following "The Bill Anderson Show and Hee Haw in 1970" and ref#15
  • "You’re" from "You’re gonna run into hecklers" should be "You're" per MOS:CURLY

Not too bad so far. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 15:25, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

1975–present: Other music opportunities and career switch[edit]

Pretty good section overall. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 15:39, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Artistry and influence[edit]

  • File:Linda Martell--Color Him Father--audio.ogg is too long per WP:SAMPLE at 24 seconds long for a track that runs for 160 seconds (which equals 2 minutes and 40 seconds). Audio clips of songs should never exceed 10% of its duration (with 30 seconds being the absolute maximum).
  • More MOS:CURLY with "It’s" from "It's still a thing today"
  • Is the "first black artists to have commercial success" more based on show performances (where she broke racial barriers with the Grand Ole Opry)? That seems like a more accurate gauge for popularity than using component charts.
    • @SNUGGUMS: No, actually it is an accurate gauge. Prior to Martell's success only Charley Pride was comparable. Previously, DeFord Bailey had appeared on the Grand Ole Opry but did not have commercial success. Martell is the first black country female performer to have a charting single (these songs reached the national charts). ChrisTofu11961 (talk) 22:15, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Getting closer to the end. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 15:52, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Personal life[edit]

Discography[edit]

  • Did her material enter any other album/song charts, primary or component?
  • If known, I'd specify when in August 1970 the Color Me Country album was released.
  • Per WP:USERG and WP:ALBUMAVOID, Discogs is an untrustworthy reference when full of user-generated content. Try to find a stronger source.

References[edit]

External links[edit]

  • Even though using Discogs for an EL isn't as bad as a source for any claims (particularly contentious ones), I wouldn't recommend having it here

Overall[edit]

  • Prose: Some copyediting is needed
  • Referencing: Not all content is sufficiently attributed, and certain citations aren't properly formatted
  • Coverage: A bit more detail could be given on family
  • Neutrality: I couldn't find any bias
  • Stability: Looks good
  • Media: One questionable image, and the audio sample needs to be reduced or removed entirely
  • Verdict: Placing the nomination on hold for seven days. I believe my concerns can be resolved within that time. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 17:03, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@SNUGGUMS: I will revise this today and tomorrow. Thanks! ChrisTofu11961 (talk) 12:53, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

My pleasure, and I look forward to seeing your improvements :) SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 12:59, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@SNUGGUMS: Thank you for your suggestions and constructive criticism! I went ahead and made all the changes I could make. Please see above. ChrisTofu11961 (talk) 22:15, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I did a bit of copyediting and adjusted some citations here. It's now GA-worthy, so congrats on getting this up to par! SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 01:40, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.