Talk:Legality of recording by civilians

Law Mid‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Enforcement Mid‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Law Enforcement. Please Join, Create, and Assess.Law EnforcementWikipedia:WikiProject Law EnforcementTemplate:WikiProject Law EnforcementLaw enforcement articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Inaccurate source[edit]

The source referenced in footnote 7 is not entirely accurate, leading me to wonder whether it should be referenced. Specifically, the "further explication of the relevant law" for West Virginia references a section of the code that does not exist. --Everything Else Is Taken (talk) 21:36, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"Voice Recording" section inaccurate[edit]

For example, in Washington State, in-person conversations that don't carry a reasonable expectation of privacy (i.e., in public) can be recorded.

Reference 10 is specifically about telephone conversations. This can't be generalized to all voice conversations.

http://www.rcfp.org/reporters-recording-guide/state-state-guide/washington — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.87.233.201 (talk) 19:39, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Voice Recording" section inaccurate for Nevada[edit]

Nevada has differing laws for in-person and electronic conversations. Electronic communication requires all parties to consent. In-person only requires one party.^[1]

You can't pay bail if you haven't been charged[edit]

The sentence:

    He was later released on bail without being charged.

does not make sense!

Gam3 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 18:26, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ https://law.justia.com/codes/nevada/2017/chapter-200/statute-200.650/

Very American-centric[edit]

Just to note that the article almost exclusively covers American law and USA in particular. It mentions European law but that's it. UK law is different. I have no idea about the majority rest of the world. I'm surprised it's rated C. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.97.62.77 (talk) 13:31, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttps://law.justia.com/codes/nevada/2017/chapter-200/statute-200.650/

[1]