Talk:Layne Morris

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This Article has Problems[edit]

This article has serious problems, not the least of which is that it has little to nothing to do with Layne Morris, and appears to suffer from the fact that it lacks a neutral point of view on a living person.

I would suggest getting rid of the acts of war argument, which is irrelevant and unsourced, and simply state that he and the Estate of Speer brought suit and won a judgment by default. Other changes would include that this article be generally cleaned up to provide a neutral point of view.Yachtsman1 (talk) 06:38, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Would it be possible for you to be specific about which passage(s) you believe do not comply with the neutrality policy? Can you offer a civil explanation as to why you don't think that passage(s).
The acts of war argument is not unsourced. It references articles which were online at the time they were inserted, and are now no longer online. References don't have to be online in order to remain WP:RS. Geo Swan (talk) 13:53, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much. The story delves into "Acts of War", which is irrelevant to the subject. This section does, however, have a section on the lawsuit, which is relevant, because the Defendant was named in the top of the article. The remaining issues, regarding what was said at the Commission, is equally irrelevant to the subject, because he was not present. The technical term for this is "content forking". WP:CFORK Naming the person accused of the act, with a tag for a quick double click, should suffice to bring this story back into compliance with Wikipedia policies as to biographies of living persons. WP:BLP. As it stands, however, it does not comply with the rules established by Wikipedia in that regard. In other words, keep the sujects separate, Geo Swan. You are using one person's biography to tell another person's story.Yachtsman1 (talk) 23:24, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 12 external links on Layne Morris. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:59, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Layne Morris. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:48, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Layne Morris. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:55, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Update needed[edit]

Morris and Tabitha Speer initiated a second civil suit, a few years ago.

In the first suit they asserted that Ahmed Said Khadr bore all responsibility, and Omar no responsibility, since Omar was just a minor. In the second suit they took the diametrically opposite position -- Omar's youth was irrelevant. Geo Swan (talk) 01:06, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Layne_Morris&oldid=1204074225"