Talk:Lactarius vietus

Lactarius vietus has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
December 29, 2010	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on February 1, 2009.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that despite its acrid taste, Lactarius vietus is edible after boiling?

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Lactarius vietus/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Sasata (talk) 01:18, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Grabbing this one! Do you realize that my first-ever GA review was almost two years ago, on a Lactarius species, written by you? Anyway, I'll have comments up in a day or two (and likely some stuff to add, you know me!) Sasata (talk) 01:18, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I remember it :) And I remember thinking that, surely, you could spew out fungal GAs if you wanted to. You proved me right there! This one's an article I wrote around the same time that I have revisited. J Milburn (talk) 01:50, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK 1st pass—nitpicks: Sasata (talk) 16:48, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

lead could be longer, especially more information about what it looks like. Link fungus, mushroom, birch; floor -> ground, or forest floor
- Done. J Milburn (talk) 19:50, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
taxobox width to 234 px? (I guess I'm foisting my personal preferences here, but I think it looks neater when the taxobox width is the same as the mycomorphbox)
- Done. J Milburn (talk) 17:17, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
synonyms ref and synonyms in taxobox? Mention Galorrheus vietus and Lactifluus vietus in taxonomy
- Done. J Milburn (talk) 18:10, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Russulales News is well-respected for info about species in that order, and has further taxonomic synonyms
- Done; where it conflicted with MycoWeb, I went with MycoWeb. J Milburn (talk) 18:10, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
link "first described" to species description
- Done. J Milburn (talk) 17:17, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Systema mycologicum and Epicrisis systematis mycologici are both on Google books (and Biodiversity Heritage Library), so you can cite these publications directly
- Done, in addition to the cites already there. J Milburn (talk) 18:10, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
"L. vietus typically" No abbr to start para
- Done. J Milburn (talk) 17:17, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
"(0.98 to 3.0 in)" suggest reducing convert template output to 1 decimal place, it's just an approximation anyway, based on a small sample size (other instances later)
- Done. J Milburn (talk) 17:17, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
link umbo
- Done. J Milburn (talk) 17:17, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I like to replace jargony "incurved" with "curved inwards" or similar
- Done. J Milburn (talk) 17:17, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
link buff, adnate, decurrent, flesh
- Done two, but defined adnate and decurrent, as we don't have articles.
"lemellulae (gills that do not reach the cap margin)" -> "lamellulae (short gills that do not reach the stem from the cap margin)"
- Massive fail on my part there... J Milburn (talk) 17:17, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
"which dries as a brownish or greenish grey"
- Done. J Milburn (talk) 17:17, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
link spore print
- Done. J Milburn (talk) 17:17, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
"amyloid (staining blue in iodine)" Melzer's reagent is more than just iodine, so probably better to use the reagent name; could also link staining
- Done. J Milburn (talk) 17:17, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
"well developed" needs hyphen
- Done. J Milburn (talk) 17:17, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
"measuring between 8 and 9.5 by ~~between~~ 6.5 to 7.5" second between unnecessary, it's implied; there's a couple later as well that can be removed
- Done. J Milburn (talk) 17:17, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
"The pleurocystidia (cystidia on the ~~edge of the~~ face of the gills)"
- I'm sorry, I think I may have literally forgotten to read through this a last time before nominating it at GAC... J Milburn (talk) 17:17, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
"narrow spindle" -> spindles
- Done. J Milburn (talk) 17:17, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
4-spored -> four-spored per MOS
- Done. J Milburn (talk) 17:17, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
"and the mushroom ~~as a whole~~ lacks a distinctive smell."
- Done. J Milburn (talk) 17:17, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
"L. vietus is fairly common" no abbr
- Done. J Milburn (talk) 17:17, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
link conifer, hardwood
- Done. J Milburn (talk) 17:17, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
any more details about the distribution? Europe and North America are big places…
- Expanded on the distribution and the ecology. J Milburn (talk) 19:39, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Refs: title case for books, sentence case for journal titles; endashes for page ranges; need page #'s for Trappe 1962; author format for ref #14 is different than the rest
- Done. J Milburn (talk) 17:23, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I had my way with it as well, and am confident it meets all of the GA criteria. Pleasure working with you, JM! Sasata (talk) 22:33, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Lactarius vietus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:55, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]