Talk:Kinga Göncz

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Criticism about her appointment[edit]

Although that piece of information about her lack of experience in foreign affairs and that her appointment came as a suprise is true and can be well-referenced (even she herself admitted being surprised in interviews), criticism should not be included while the article is such a short stub, as it neccesarily leads to violating NPOV. Removed along with the heavily biased comment that followed. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 80.98.238.80 (talk) 00:35, 13 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Art collection lawsuit + article cleanup[edit]

I looked at this page and its external links, and realized that few of the linked pages even mentioned Göncz. Given that, it was clear that the artwork & lawsuit was being given undue weight.

I've cleaned the article up to be about her career, but discovered in the process that there were zero biographical sources. I couldn't find any articles about her — could others look and see if they have more success? DoriTalkContribs 00:34, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that, but have you ever checked the links, which went to the numbers '2007' and '2008', because if you would have done so you should have read at least the title and who was the one addressed: Kinga Göncz, nobody else. So at this point i don't get it, why it does not have any connection to her professional career? Maybe because the truth hurts? I don't know. And I've added those links, which hasn't mentioned the name of Kinga Göncz, just in order to prove the first sentence's legitimacy [I think this is how it should work, I claim something and then I add proves, or do you disagree?]--Yorkcase (talk) 08:34, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kinga Göncz. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:52, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kinga Göncz. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:29, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]