Talk:Kimberley Conrad

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Image removal[edit]

WP:FU is really explicit. A fair use magazine cover can not be used to illustrate generally the article on the person shown on it. If you add back the cover in violation of policy I will need to note this on the copyright problem notice board. The editor formerly known as Harmonica Wolfowitz 00:24, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A photo of a magazine cover in a Wikipedia article might be allowable and within the allowed practices under copyright law. Under the basic premise that wikipedia exists for general information; In substance, Wikipedia serves a journalism-type mission, existing to educate people. For example. a newspaper writer, and his editors, who are doing an article on somebody who is pictured on a magazine cover, might choose to include a photo of that magazine cover. In essence, use of the magazine cover is but component of the larger creation of intellectual work. The borrowed use of the magazine cover does not serve to exist as a product by itself, be it free or for a price. Contrarily, there is other different use which could be a flagrant copyright infringement. I cannot make poster prints of a magazine cover and sell them individually, for in that case, the image of the magazine cover becomes a commodity by itself for sale on the open market. In that case, I do not own the image, and cannot use it in a commercial venture. Intellectual property, which includes photos or the written word, owned by some other person or corporate entity, can possibly be allowed to be used where it exists as a minor component used to enhance a much larger piece of work. Marc S., Dania Fl 206.192.35.125 (talk) 20:54, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A picture of Miss Kimberley Conrad[edit]

I think this article would benefit from a picture of Kimberly Miss Conrad. Colin4C 11:58, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

knighted?[edit]

Onl< men can be knighted. She is a woman, so the whole procedure is not legit. 84.128.165.35 (talk) 20:25, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Personal measurements[edit]

Why include her bust, waist and hip measurements? This is Wikipedia, not Playboy. Aside from the fact that these measurements can change if you merely have a big lunch, unless you're going to include the same measurements for everyone else (men and women) I think it is unnecessary.109.180.3.254 (talk) 06:12, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]