Talk:Khaidi No. 150

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Khaidi No. 150 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Film: Indian

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force.

India: Cinema Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

Semi-protected edit request on 17 January 2017[edit]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

box office- 106 crores (5days) 49.204.228.47 (talk) 13:19, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. Kosack (talk) 13:32, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding box office[edit]

http://www.ibtimes.co.in/khaidi-no-150-16-day-box-office-collection-chiranjeevis-movie-inches-closer-rs-150-cr-mark-2nd-713807 Hope this is a credible source to depend on. Change the box office figure as mentioned in the article after having a glimpse of it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.164.23.178 (talk) 17:46, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done in this edit. HansIndia appears to be repeating a tweet from a film critic, with no confirmation that they've independently confirmed the claim. The film critic's Twitter isn't a verified account, and it's unclear why a film critic would be an expert on film financials. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:26, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]