Talk:Kaadhali (1997 film)

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force.

India: Cinema Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

Requested move 13 January 2022[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Page moved (non-admin closure) Bingobro (Chat) 08:30, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kaadhali → Kaadhali (1997 film) – Not the main topic when compared to page views of Kaadhali (2017 film). DareshMohan (talk) 02:59, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nomination and also support creation of a Kaadhali disambiguation page that would list Kaadhali (1997 film) as well as Kaadhali (2017 film). —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 06:31, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nomination. ---CX Zoom(^he/_him) (^{let's talk}|_contribs) 10:50, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support move and the creation of dab page. -- Ab207 (talk) 16:59, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support the 1997 one gets 202 views but the 2017 one gets 749[[1]] and 2017 is long enough ago that recentism is not likely an issue. Crouch, Swale (talk) 10:22, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support. The 2017 film should be the primary topic, based on the page views. Adumbrativus (talk) 03:11, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.