Talk:Justus/GA1
GA Review[edit]
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nice and short, just the way I like 'em. ;-)
- Can you clarify this for me: "He was regarded as a saint after his death ...". Seems a bit vague. Was he actually canonized, or was it just that some people thought of him as a saint?
- He's "pre-process" as a saint. He was never formally canonized, and I don't show any sign that he was ever "approved" later like Peter of Canterbury was. He's considered a saint because he's listed on calendars of saints. Ealdgyth - Talk 19:15, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
- "In the 1090s, his remains were translated to a shrine ...". Could that be changed to something more obvious like "moved" without any loss of meaning?
- Done. Linked to Translation (relics) as well as a quick
- "When a pagan reaction against Christianity broke out after the death of Æthelberht ...". I'm not sure that "reactions" can break out. What form did this reaction take?
- The bishops of Rochester and London were driven out from their sees, and ran to Gaul for safety. Justus managed to return to Rochester later, Mellitus never did make it back to London. I've tried "developed"
- I think I'd be happier if the lead began simply with "Justus" rather that "Saint Justus", as he wasn't a saint while he was Archbishop of Canterbury.
- The prose needs tightening in a few places. Do you know a good copyeditor who might be able to help?
That's it, nothing much to be concerned about there, so I'm putting this article on hold. --Malleus Fatuorum 12:41, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
I'm happy with the article now, so I'm listing it as a GA. --Malleus Fatuorum 21:05, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.