Talk:Justice Party (United States)

Political position

Why was this party originally listed as center-left? It shares a lot more with the Democratic Progressive Caucus and the Green Party than, say, Obama's mainstream liberalism, and its platform is firmly to the left of the resolutely center-left US Democratic Party.

Since there isn't a source, I changed it until someone can justify otherwise. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 18.189.22.31 (talk) 13:16, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

--- I think the Justice Party should be considered center-left, as the party is not challenging capitalism, but merely seeking to regulate it. It's Keynesian in these regards, rather than neoliberal, but this does not make it leftist! Like European social democracy parties, the Justice Party is center-left. The Democratic Progressive Caucus is not left-wing; It's center-left, whereas the rest of the party is center (Just think of Bill Clinton and the "New Democrats"). The left consists of anti-capitalists, such as SYRIZA in Greece or the Bolivarian parties in Latin America. I think part of the problem with classifying political parties and positions in the United States is due to rhetoric and symbolic battles. The wikipedia page on the political spectrum proves my point: "Thus, the word 'left' in American political parlance may refer to 'liberalism' and be identified with the Democratic Party, whereas in a country such as France these positions would be regarded as relatively more right-wing, and 'left' is more likely to refer to 'socialist' positions rather than 'liberal' ones."

We need a more objective political spectrum, from left to right. If we plot socialism on the left and capitalism on the right (in their "purest" forms), then Keynesianism is in the middle. Really, the Democratic Party is center-right in these regards. That's why you see the Conservative Party in the UK holding positions to the left of the Democratic Party in the US. Granted, I'm leaving out social issues here, but I think that if you look at political parties across Europe and the world, you'll see a much different classification system in the United States. I'm changing this back to center-left. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.2.129.227 (talk) 02:45, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

If one reads the comments posted by Justice Party members on its own forum, you would see that there are still quite a few of them clinging on to some notion of centrist nonsense, whereby the JP takes a stand for interests of both Left and Right, a ridiculous concept considering that efforts to defend inequality would sorta kinda negate any efforts to strengthen equality. Let's remember that the Right exists only because of inequality and would instantly vaporize if that foundation were removed. We can stop being silly now. 68.190.23.42 (talk) 14:42, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Rationale for party's formation

What distinguishes this party from the Green Party? They seem similar. The article ought to cover something about the rationale for founding the party, specifically why the founders did not/do not simply join the Greens.CountMacula (talk) 04:04, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

In the begining of 2012 Rocky said "I like the Green Party and those I have met who are associated with it. However, that party seems to pursue a loser's strategy of conceding that it is simply interested in engaging and expanding the dialogue on issues. It is also perceived as a marginal party that will not grow into a major force in U.S. politics. I hope to see a coalition of either the Green Party or many of its members with the Justice Party" I doubt this is relevant for the page however.Joshgreene (talk) 00:42, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

References

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.justicepartyusa.org/tags/platform. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Lagrange613 21:40, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 external links on Justice Party (United States). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120529020413/http://www.ballot-access.org/2011/12/29/justice-party-qualifies-for-mississippi-ballot/ to http://www.ballot-access.org/2011/12/29/justice-party-qualifies-for-mississippi-ballot/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20121104131724/http://www.ballot-access.org:80/2012/10/27/ballot-access-news-october-2012-print-edition/ to http://www.ballot-access.org/2012/10/27/ballot-access-news-october-2012-print-edition/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20111217053650/http://www.justicepartyusa.net// to http://www.justicepartyusa.net
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120324210247/http://torinnelsonforcongress.com:80/ to http://torinnelsonforcongress.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 05:54, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

WP:NPOV

The wording in this article sounds just a bit too "glowing" to fit NPOV. Open to any feedback.Nemoanon (talk) 20:24, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

Quite a late response and possibly pointless at this point, but I can see where you're coming from with the "glowing" comment. However, that might just be because I like some of the things they're saying. I think it's pretty neutral. It gives a brief history of the party, and it lists the stances they have. I don't see what exactly could be done to make it seem more neutral, mainly because there isn't much information about the party. If you have any ideas on what could be done, or anyone else who reads this, feel free to comment. Untitled.docx (talk) 23:05, 20 September 2021 (UTC) 23:03, 20 September 2021 (UTC) 23:02, 20 September 2021 (UTC)