Talk:Junius manuscript

	Anglo-Saxon England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anglo-Saxon KingdomsWikipedia:WikiProject Anglo-Saxon KingdomsTemplate:WikiProject Anglo-Saxon KingdomsAnglo-Saxon Kingdoms articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

This page draws heavily from Andrew Sanders's The Short Oxford History of English Literature without citing it as the source.

Are there direct or virtually direct quotations? If so, it is WP:COPYVIO if not referenced, and for short fair use quotes. If it is adapted, it should be referenced. Perhaps you could look at this, if you have the book. Of course, both may derive from a common source, if the wording is different. Johnbod 15:44, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Title[edit]

I believe the name "Cædmon manuscript" has fallen out of fashion; most recent articles and books call it "Junius manuscript" or "Junius 11". Shouldn't we move this article? – Swa cwæð Ælfgar (talk) 16:06, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Shall we take a vote? I'm in for the same reason. --Akhenaten0 (talk) 19:33, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 13 February 2017[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. Jenks24 (talk) 12:04, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cædmon manuscript → Junius manuscript – As can be seen in the bibliography, current scholarship tends to use "Junius manuscript" rather than "Cædmon manuscript". The idea that the MS contains poems by Cædmon has been discarded for a while now, and keeping the poet's name in the title could be misleading. – Swa cwæð Ælfgar (talk) 08:27, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support formally. --Akhenaten0 (talk) 20:31, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.