Talk:Judicial misconduct

Law Mid‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Philosophy: Ethics / Social and political Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Ethics
	Social and political philosophy

Skepticism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Judicial misconduct. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160224143909/http://www.wxyz.com/news/local-news/investigations/fmr-supreme-court-justice-diane-hathaway-released-from-camp-cupcake to http://www.wxyz.com/news/local-news/investigations/fmr-supreme-court-justice-diane-hathaway-released-from-camp-cupcake

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:47, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The claim that the JCIO investigates judicial misconduct in the UK disputed.[edit]

The JCIO in the UK do not investigate most judicial misconduct on the grounds that it would impair judicial independence. The JCIO only investigate "personal misconduct" i.e. judges being arbitrarily rude or falling asleep in court.

Quote: "We are an independent office which supports the Lord Chancellor and Lord Chief Justice in considering complaints about the personal conduct of judicial office holders.

We cannot accept complaints about a judge’s decision or the way a judge has managed a case." - https://judicialconduct.judiciary.gov.uk/

82.27.35.195 (talk) 10:12, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Name of the page[edit]

Should we divide this page into two, one dealing with judicial misconduct in USA and the second with that is the UK. We should also add a project to add pages about judicial misconduct in other countries? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wilkn (talk • contribs) 06:33, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]