Talk:José Leonardo

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: move page Chihin.chong (tea and biscuits) 09:06, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Jusepe LeonardoJosé Leonardo – Correct his given name per the sources. Apparently an editor confused him with a contemporary of his, named Jusepe Martínez. Relisted. BDD (talk) 23:32, 2 May 2013 (UTC) Daniel the Monk (talk) 17:25, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Survey[edit]

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
  • On the face of it oppose He seems to be called Jusepe more often than José Leonardo. (I don't understand why you think any confusion with Jusepe Martínez has occured) In ictu oculi (talk) 18:11, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Of the four cited references, two use José, one uses Jusepe, and one uses both. Google hits favor José (compare "jusepe leonardo" baroque painter -wikipedia -José and "José leonardo" baroque painter -wikipedia -jusepe), and that's also the form used in the VIAF record. José seems more common in general when only one name is used. I agree with IIO, however, that I don't see evidence of confusion with Martínez. --BDD (talk) 23:37, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support: Jose is the Spanish name - Jusepe a version of his Jewish name. In 17th century Spain, it is likely that he like many other Jews chnaged his name to Jose, which is how he is commonly know today. I have added some more refs.

Jezhotwells (talk) 14:59, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion[edit]

Any additional comments:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.