This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brazil, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Brazil and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrazilWikipedia:WikiProject BrazilTemplate:WikiProject BrazilBrazil articles
The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
Jorge Stolfi write about himself in wikipedia[edit]
I think Jorge Stolfi has break the rules about wikipedia because he has create a page for himself. Jorge Stolfi is the only editor of this page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chek2fire (talk • contribs) 22:43, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
That is totally incorrect. If you check the history, you will see that the article was created by someone else on 2007-09-21. That article focused on only one of the things that I did. I hoped someone else expanded the article, but when that did not happen, I did it myself on 2010-12-28. There is no blanket rule against editing your own article, as long as you abide to the other rules. Since then others have edited the article, including a vandal who stated that I was a bitcoin enthusiast. I had to correct that. Another editor added that I have been slow to grade tests in 2016 (which is true, but hardly "encyclopedic") and that I assign random grades (which is not true). Obviously I am tempted to remove that line, but that would be improper. --Jorge Stolfi (talk) 20:01, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Does the following really belong on the page? It is simply a personal attack on him which says his testimony cannot be trusted because he is anti-bitcoin.
"This letter had doubt cast on it for non-technical reasons by “IT specialist” Colin Baird in a letter to the SEC some months later.[16]"
