This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
John Wamsley is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Earth Sancuaries re-directs here, but is not even mentioned.
Not a single line about the wildlife sanctuaries he built.
The bio stops in the 60s.
The fate of his company and the recent state is missing as well. Reference 4 gives most of the information, but is only cited for this cat hat, surely not the best source.
"importance=low" - Is this the way the Autralian Wiki people treat one of their leading and envisioning conservationists?
Jens from Germany --47.64.155.200 (talk) 07:51, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The solution is in your hands. The article definitely needs info on Yookamurra and Earth Sanctuaries Ltd. Keep it factual and provide references where possible. But in Wikipedia terms, importance=low is appropriate. Doug butler (talk) 00:08, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
.svg){kind=logo}
