Talk:John Creswell

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Star Route Postal Ring[edit]

There is some question as to Creswell's involvement with the Star Route Postal Ring that involved straw bidding and bribery in order to obtain valuable Star Route Postal contracts. He had received checks in his name only rather then as Postmaster General. He stopped this practice when he was informed that it was against a Postal regulation that forbid a Postmaster General to take checks in their own name. He was also censored by the minority Democratic party in an 1872 investigation into the Star Route Postal Ring. Staw bidding was at its highest while Creswell was Postmaster General. Historically Creswell is viewed as a Postal reformer. It is unknown why he resigned. He may have resigned not because he knew scandals were in the Grant Administration, he may have resigned because he was involved in the Star Route Trading Ring. This is unknown. Any suggestions? Cmguy777 (talk) 18:44, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have found no evidence that Creswell was involved with the Star Route frauds. These frauds had to due with monetary expansions of contracts, after bidding for contracts and contracts for postal carriage had been secured. Evidently the Assistant to the Postmaster General may have been the person who allowed contractors to increase their contract expenses charged to the federal government. Cmguy777 (talk) 18:02, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Article improvements[edit]

I have recently made improvements to the John A.J. Creswell article. Other editors are welcome to make any neccessary or constructive changes to the article. Thanks. Cmguy777 (talk) 17:58, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Photo[edit]

I moved older photo to talk page. Updated article with newer photo.

Older photo of John A J Creswell

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on John Creswell. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:19, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]