Talk:Jerry B. Jenkins/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

Untitled

Why is there a picture of Billy Graham on Jerry B. Jenkins entry, but no picture of Jerry B. Jenkins? There are pictures of him at his site. Are there copyright issues? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.152.143.10 (talk) 04:16, 28 November 2005 (UTC)

Probably. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.220.47.145 (talk) 02:30, 2 December 2005 (UTC)

"Hack Writer"

Is there any reason for the insulting language regarding Jenkins? In its truest sense, the term can be applied to a myriad of writers, but I don't see that happening on WP or anywhere else for that matter. --Mhking 02:12, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

This was inserted by 24.199.67.217, who has been introducing blatent NPOV violations into articles recently. See his/her talk page. --AbsolutDan (talk) 02:44, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

33 years

Married more than 33 years? How many more? Why is this included? I'm cutting it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.81.114.143 (talk) 22:25, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Added CWG material

As a member and apprentice of the Guild, I felt an entry for the guild was appropriate. All material has come from CWG published material. A request for Jerry Jenkins to evaluate the entry for his approval in in process. RayLBailey 20:46, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

The section amounts to advertising the CWG, and hence is not NPOV. I have tagged it as such. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.162.89.203 (talk) 14:32, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
Agreed. If someone wants to rewrite it so it isn't an advertisement, go for it. Until then, out with it. --Atemperman (talk) 02:46, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

Bibliography

Where is his list of books at, including those that have been transferred to film? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.195.223.183 (talk) 02:11, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

Objectivity/ Unsourced Text

Someone who is knowledgable of Christianity and respectfull of the diversity of opinion within Christiandom and or Religious Studies should review this article for objectivity and unsourced text. I'm not qualified nor do I care, but the following text seems suspicious to me: "With the presumption of eschatological plots, persons and conclusions, and with so many people basing their eschatological understanding on the Left behind series, Jenkins and LaHaye have been accused of violating the warning given in Revelation 22:18-19 not to add to or take away from the words of the Revelation. This alleged trespass has not been publicly evaluated, if at all, by the board of The Moody Bible Institute, where Jenkins serves as Chairman." — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonxwood (talkcontribs) 00:37, 26 April 2014 (UTC)