Talk:Jeremy Strong

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Plagiarism[edit]

The current entry not only relies heavily on one source, it is word-for-word taken from the New Yorker profile in places. 173.8.31.161 (talk) 00:08, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Over-reliance on New Yorker profile[edit]

This article cites the New Yorker profile over 20 times, and seems to over-rely on that piece. Parts of the article simply re-state the profile, rather than provide basic biography. For example, there's a very lengthy section on "Acting philosophy and technique" which seems overly focused on this, while few other actors have such a section in their article. Really need to find more diverse and balanced sources for this biography. -- ZimZalaBim talk 00:56, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not about to do it myself, but if anyone wants to tackle overhauling the section, here's two other articles that might be useful:
Kawnhr (talk) 20:22, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 3 October 2023[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved (closed by non-admin page mover) BegbertBiggs (talk) 23:04, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]



– Clear primary topic by usage (13,000% more pageviews) and significance (Emmy etc. winner). No dab page needed. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 22:30, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Move. Should be no need for full RM, but you could wait 24 hours to move both pages; do not delete the DAB page, but move it to Jeremy Strong (disambiguation). — HTGS (talk) 03:47, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • It's interesting that in this case WikiNav https://wikinav.toolforge.org/?language=en&title=Jeremy_Strong doesn't show such a clear picture like in those other few cases you nominated in the same go. The global ratio incoming to outgoing is at 52%, though it's still 354 vs one more entry that doesn't render so it sounds like a 10:1 still, or we're missing some other Jeremy Strong that an apparent minority of readers are looking for. --Joy (talk) 07:19, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

"He has been recognized for his intense approach to the craft of acting"[edit]

...do we really want to say this – in the second sentence of the article? Gnom (talk) 19:39, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

While we’re at it, has he really been recognized for his involvement in films inspired by real-life events? — HTGS (talk) 05:28, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]