Talk:Janet Beaton

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Peerage and Baronetage.

Scotland Low‑importance

	Scotland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's History Mid‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Janet Beaton appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 24 March 2009 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Janet Beaton, Lady of Branxholme and Buccleugh, had five husbands and was immortalized as Sir Walter Scott's Wizard Lady of Branxholm in his poem "The Lay of the Last Minstrel"?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2009/March.

Wikipedia

Social status of Janet[edit]

Suggest a change, since neither by birth nor marriage was Janet a noblewoman, her father together with all her husbands being gentry and lairds. Hors-la-loi (talk) 09:04, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good suggestion! I have since changed the lead, calling her aristocratic.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 09:42, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation page[edit]

We should make Janet Beaton (disambiguation) - James Hamilton, 1st Earl of Arran was married to a different Janet Beaton (probably this Janet's cousin, but I'd have to do more digging to be sure). This Janet quite rightly should have the main entry. I can't do it tonight, but will try later this weekend if no one beats me to it. - PKM (talk) 02:39, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. The Earl of Arran's wife was another Janet Beaton who died in 1522.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 08:29, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done.

Are you planning to do Walter Scott of Branxholme and Buccleuch? If not, I'll start it.

Also, are you going to nominate this article for DYK? If not I will. (And Agnes Keith, too.) - PKM (talk) 16:34, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse my ignorance, but what does DYK stand for?--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 16:46, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, "Did You Know" on the Main Page. The process is a bit complex, but you deserve recognition for this work. I am happy to do the nomination for you. - PKM (talk) 16:50, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, thank you very much.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 17:00, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Officially the cutoff is 5 days from first creation, but I put the noms in anyway...PKM (talk) 17:28, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Do you want to do Walter Scott of Branxholme and Buccleuch? If not, I'm on it. - PKM (talk) 17:33, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You go ahead and do it. I must go prepare dinner soon. I'm on CET time. Besides, I created a new article last night, my eyes are killing me!LOL!--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 17:44, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, working on it now. - PKM (talk) 18:58, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And Sir Walter is up!

My compliments to you, PKM. The article is very well-written, well-sourced and also is enjoyable to read. Great work!--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 06:15, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Glad you like it. :-) - PKM (talk) 08:00, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]