Talk:Jamie Sorrentini

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Jamie Sorrentini article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 90 days

A fact from Jamie Sorrentini appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 26 July 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that actress Jamie Sorrentini was directed by Harold Prince in the U.S. national tour of the musical Parade?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2010/July.

Wikipedia

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers (assessed as Low-importance).

New Jersey Low‑importance

	New Jersey portal This article is part of WikiProject New Jersey, an effort to create, expand, and improve New Jersey–related articles to Wikipedia feature-quality standard. Please join in the discussion.New JerseyWikipedia:WikiProject New JerseyTemplate:WikiProject New JerseyNew Jersey articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Identification as a Scientologist[edit]

[1] - Recent additions by Delicious carbuncle (talk · contribs) failed WP:RS on a WP:BLP page. They have been removed. Please, do not add them back again. Thank you, -- Cirt (talk) 04:22, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am perplexed by your statement, Cirt, since you yourself have used the same source to indicate that people are members of the Church of Scientology. I'm sure I can find an example where it is used on BLPs. Is it acceptable on other articles, but not on this one, or jut not acceptable at all? I've taken the liberty of changing the title of this thread since it seems to be singling me out in a way that makes me uncomfortable. I would prefer that it not be changed back. Thanks. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 04:30, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have not used that source for years, after discussion on multiple talk pages and consensus against using that website as a source. -- Cirt (talk) 04:33, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps you could find links to some of those discussions? Delicious carbuncle (talk) 04:35, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Responded, at WP:RSN. -- Cirt (talk) 05:58, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Now at WP:RSN, at Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#www.truthaboutscientology.com_usage_in_BLPs. -- Cirt (talk) 04:36, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Since the source is currently used in other BLPs and there is a discussion started at RSN, I am adding the disputed information back to the article. Although I understand there may not be a consensus on the use of the source, I can't see how this is a BLP violation (and Cirt has yet to provide the requested explanation). No one has disputed that Sorrentini is a Scientologist. If this really is an issue, it can be removed, but I think it is clear that Cirt is far too involved to be the one to do it. Thanks. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 07:36, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is a BLP, material contested under the policy stays OUT until we have a consensus that it is safe to put it in. The source looks problematic to me, although I've not reached a final opinion. DO NOT replace it for now, or you may be blocked.--Scott Mac 09:22, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Agree with Scott MacDonald (talk · contribs), thank you. ;) -- Cirt (talk) 17:57, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]