Talk:James Kearns
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the James Kearns article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This page was proposed for deletion by 151.200.237.53 (talk · contribs) on 14 June 2008 with the comment: Article lacks Attribution to Verify WP:BIO or WP:BLP notability criteria ... an IMDb listing by itself is insufficient WP:RS. It was seconded by Triwbe (talk · contribs) on 2008-06-14 It was contested by Phil Bridger (talk · contribs) on 2008-06-15 with the comment: there are plenty more sources found by Google News, including many that focus on the subject as the reason why the film is so bad |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
In my opinion, this article either lacks sufficient Attribution that it satisfies the Notability criteria for Biographies, or it may violate the Conflict of interest guideline, or perhaps it is a Copyright violation.
Untitled[edit]
Wikipedia articles must be based on reliable sources to verify any claims of notability. Even though the lack of reliable source attribution in an article is not grounds for deletion in itself, an article with absolutely no sources (or only external links to unreliable ones) suggests to some editors that multiple reliable sources may not, in fact, exist.
Although I am considering tagging this article for deletion according to the Deletion policy, I am nonetheless willing to assist User:Spencer Jackson (talk · contribs), and other recent contributors to this article, to make constructive improvements to it ... I do not have time to examine this article in depth at the moment, and it may improve over time, in which case this warning was premature.
Please respond on this Discussion page, instead of on my Talk page, in order to avoid fragmenting the conversation.
Happy Editing! — 151.200.237.53 (talk · contribs) 19:51, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
I have removed the [[Category:Flagged articles]] from
the message above
. it was flagged at least two months ago by Some Other Editor,
but the current version looks to me like a
Righteous Stub Avicennasis @ 04:19, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
PROD[edit]
OK, It's been a week and there has been no improvement ... a single IMDb link is not sufficient reliable sources to meet the general WP:Notability guideline, let alone WP:BIO or WP:BLP ... Happy Editing! — 151.200.237.53 (talk · contribs) 15:27, 14 June 2008 (UTC)