Talk:James Ivory

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the James Ivory article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers.

Oregon Low‑importance

	Oregon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
The current collaborations of the month are Women's History Month: Create or improve articles for women listed at Oregon Women of Achievement (modern) or Women of the West, Oregon chapter (historical).

LGBT studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Romantic relationship with Merchant[edit]

Regarding queries over Ivory's relationship with Merchant as romantic life partner, this is public knowledge, and I am copying and pasting a reply below that I wrote some time ago to another user who queried the same thing about Merchant:

Most newspaper obituaries of Ismail Merchant did not address directly his romantic relationship with James Ivory. A notable exception was the Los Angeles Times - one of the three major US national newspapers.

Please see this link to the obit article in the LA Times archives:

Obituary of Ismail Merchant, LA Times, May 26 2005

Note how the first line of the article excerpt describes James Ivory as Merchant's life partner in addition to being a professional partner. The full article (I have the full article from a commercial database with restricted access) ends with the line:

"In addition to Ivory, Merchant is survived by sisters Saherbanu Kabadia, Sahida Retiwala, Ruksana Khan and Rashida Bootwala."

i.e. Ivory is treated with greater priority in that final sentence than Merchant's 4 sisters, and the use of "survived" indicates a personal relationship.

There was some unhappiness in the LGBT community that most obituraries censored or used euphemisms for the personal relationship between Merchant and Ivory e.g. The original Guardian obit (there were 2) used a pointed and emphatic last line "He did not marry."

Please see also this column from the Washington Post, another of the major 3 US national newspapers addressing this unhappiness about the censorship:

"Question Celebrity", Washington Post, June 26 2005

and this one from the LGBT newspaper, The Washington Blade:

"News organizations ignore gay filmmaker’s sexual orientation"

Requested move 25 August 2016[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved per nom. No such user (talk) 12:02, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

– James Ivory, the director, is the clear WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. He has a storied and notable career that includes three Academy Award nominations, among others, and receives by far the most pageviews and Google results for "James Ivory". The other James Ivorys listed appear very obscure and do not get many hits at all. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 23:34, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The other James Ivories are hardly "very obscure". The watchmaker is still notable for his work after 250 years. — AjaxSmack 01:44, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The watchmaker has only received 618 hits in the past year, so he is likely obscure to most; certainly not as well-known as the acclaimed director. It is most likely that for the foreseeable future, the director is going to be the most prominent in reliable sources and pageviews. I see no reason to assume the others are so especially dominant that the most prominent usage of "James Ivory", a prominent filmmaker, should be disregarded. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 03:18, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

SUPPORT: As per nom. -- Jack of Oz ^{[pleasantries]} 05:32, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support, obvious primary topic. Cavarrone 11:06, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. ^Ḉɱ̍ 2nd anniv. 23:09, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support, primary topic. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 14:45, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.