Talk:James Hinton (surgeon)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Philosophy: Philosophers / Ethics / Modern Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophers
	Ethics
	Modern philosophy

Requested move 2 July 2019[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. Most editors argue that there is no primary topic for the name James Hinton. (non-admin closure) — Newslinger talk 00:22, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

– Although the 19th-century surgeon, historian and philosopher is the only James Hinton whose Wikipedia main title header does not contain a middle initial or a middle name, such a happenstance should not advance him by default to the position of WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. His entry does not appear in any other Wikipedia and there is no indication that, 144 years after his death, history has judged that his name stands above all others named "James Hinton". — Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 18:44, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom (nice catch, Roman!) - no clear primary topic. Move disambiguation page to basename. Paintspot Infez (talk) 20:15, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support – no primarytopic here. Dicklyon (talk) 04:55, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. If the other two men are not best known as just "James Hinton", then the current setup is fine. PC78 (talk) 11:15, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

By that standard, the entire concept of WP:PRIMARYTOPIC becomes distorted and, ultimately meaningless, because the primary entry would no longer be the one that is sought to a greater degree than all the others combined, but the one that uses no middle names and initials when all the other entries do use middle names and/or initials. Using reductio ad absurdum, one could then argue that if the John Kennedy (disambiguation) page had a single entry for a "John Kennedy", while all the other entries used middle names and/or initials, then the plain "John Kennedy" should be primary because the president was generally known as John F. Kennedy or John Fitzgerald Kennedy. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 19:50, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Support per points above. Dicklyon (talk) 19:57, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.