This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Gleeanon409, I see that you added back the "“prominent queer couple” part here with a different source, so that looks fine for now. But you also added back the Vogue interview part and per this article by Billboard, Jacob only made a cameo; it wasn't a "joint interview" as that edit so states. If you think making a cameo appearance in someone else's interview is noteworthy enough to be included in the article, then I guess I could revise it to make the statement factually accurate instead of removing the inaccurate statement, similar to what I did here [1]. Some1 (talk) 03:03, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
We go by what reliable sources state which so far is “joint interview”, I suppose we can add Billboard characterized Bixenman as making a cameo appearance but I don’t see that distinction as helping the reader understand the subject. Vogue did an interview, they both took part, other media reported on it. Gleeanon409 (talk) 03:05, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
We go by what reliable sources state which so far is “joint interview” Which sources in the article explicitly state that this was a "joint interview"? The source you added for the Vogue interview here doesn't even include the word "joint" anywhere in the article and it only talks about this interview being Troye's... Some1 (talk) 03:09, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It was a cameo. No reliable source states it was a joint interview. That aside, the cameo is in no way noteworthy. It contributes nothing to Sivan's or Bixenman's notability. The "prominent queer couple" label was given to them by one source: Queerty, so not only is it WP:UNDUE, it also fails WP:NOTINDISCRIMINATE. KyleJoantalk 03:13, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Exactly, it should be removed. And thanks for dealing with this same issue over at Troye Sivan. Some1 (talk) 03:13, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Gleeanon409, are you going to continue with this discussion or are you just going to revert multiple editors to keep what you want? This is both regarding this article and the Troye Sivan's article. Some1 (talk) 03:25, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
