This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chess, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Chess on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChessWikipedia:WikiProject ChessTemplate:WikiProject Chesschess articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bulgaria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bulgaria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BulgariaWikipedia:WikiProject BulgariaTemplate:WikiProject BulgariaBulgaria articles
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 07:59, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I think the section on the handshake controversy is a bit biased towards Short, it makes it sound like Short was in the right when really it should just report what happened or both points of view. The opposing view (read the http://reports.chessdom.com/short-cheparinov-comments article in the references) would be that a) he refused to shake his hand twice b) short got up and went and found a referee to complain c) the referee incorrectly penalized d) but the penalty was overturned the next day because e) shaking hands is just a recommendation or guideline, not a rule —Preceding unsigned comment added by Inputable (talk • contribs) 22:53, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I slightly disagree with your version of events, especially with e). It is true that in their protest Cheparinov and Danailov claimed that the FIDE behavioural norms are no more than a recommendation (maybe we should add that this is what they say), but that was not the reason the Appeals Committee overruled the arbiter. They only changed the decision to declare the game a loss because "GM Cheparinov, after his initial refusal to shake hands with GM Short, didn’t clearly reject the arbiter’s request to do so" ([1]) and the behavioural norms say that arbiters should give players a second chance to shake hands ([2]). I did add a few words to the article to emphasize that the initial forfeit was overruled ([3]). David Šenek (talk) 11:56, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
