Talk:Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Objectivism, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.ObjectivismWikipedia:WikiProject ObjectivismTemplate:WikiProject ObjectivismObjectivism articles

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Philosophy: Literature / Epistemology Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophical literature
	Epistemology

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Category[edit]

Shouldn't this have the philosophy book category label? uriah923^(talk) 19:37, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

An edit war over the inclusion of categories? Seriously? The book is obviously a philosophy book, so why wouldn't it have that category tag, Buridan? uriah923^(talk) 17:11, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Honest... I wouldn't kid you. There is now a section at the bottom of the List of Philosophy publications talk page titled, "mediation" where that is exactly what is being debated. I'm just about to put a reply there. Give me a minute and take a look. Also, should you be willing, I'd love to see you make a comment as well. SteveWolfer 18:03, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have a link to the discussion? Crazynas^t 21:12, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the discussion is near the bottom of the Discussion tab's page in a section called "mediation" (and for several sections above that) for theList of publications in philosophy‎ - I don't know how to do the Wiki formatting to make that come out right, but here is the URL http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:List_of_publications_in_philosophy SteveWolfer 22:25, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This link works Talk:List_of_publications_in_philosophy#mediation (user:Uriah clued me in) SteveWolfer 22:25, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Main points of the book, please[edit]

It would be helpful if the main points or theses of the book were summarized. -- DBooth (talk) 21:23, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Languages[edit]

Are there any sources which could verify the claimed foreign languages this book is supposed to be available in? I tried very hard to find a German translation and can only arrive at the conclusion that such a translation does not exist. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.195.197.70 (talk) 13:43, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Both Worldcat and the Ayn Rand Institute list Chinese as the only translation, though neither list may be exhaustive. You might have better luck asking at the reference desk. I've removed the section of the article for now. Skomorokh 17:24, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]