Talk:Intelligence and personality

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I will be happy to help improve this article[edit]

The article topic is the main research topic of researchers I know in person in my off-wiki life, and I have access to a wide variety of secondary sources about the topic by those authors and other authors. I would be glad to help improve this article to form it into a soundly sourced encyclopedic article on this interesting topic. -- WeijiBaikeBianji (talk, how I edit) 15:31, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

life coaching essay[edit]

Wenn jeder sich auf jeden verläßt, sind alle verlassen. Meaning: if you always rely on others, you'll have to deal with the mess of the resulting incompetence. Therefore, too much agreeableness is plain dumb. Judging people because of their deeds and circumstances might lead to better outcomes than to judge them generally "as a person", whatever this vaguely means. Neuroticism, which is the opposite of the belief in good, might prevent serious mistakes. Always stay on your small relevant ground and make everything sound before you progress further with overlooked errors. Hochmut kommt vor dem Fall Meaning: Once you have reached the bottom and are happy with it, you will not hurt yourself by falling any deeper. So-called "losers" will therefore rather seek misery which they are familiar with, which is neuroticism. Going postal would be the resulting end of the spectrum. Furthermore, in antisocial families, where children are mistreated, there are high levels of neuroticism and low levels of agreeableness found. Where potential criminals are raised, there is often a low level of education, i.e. worse test perfomance. The reaction to manipulation and own wrong judgments is quite interesting. Low agreeableness might lead to more consistent thoughts which are connected better. A smiley simply is not enough. But once you have fallen for something hard, it will also be harder to make the best out of your fundamentally wrong views, which are still connected logically well with each other. High conscientousness and low openness too make it hard to change old views, but errors can be very malicious and it can be built upon them smartly. Afterwards, flexibly and quickly throwing everything away might not be the best option. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:C6:E701:6E00:5C6A:D801:48C7:F340 (talk) 16:49, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]