Talk:Infanta Ana de Jesus Maria of Braganza

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

Apparently Portugal did not have in 1820's a surplus royal prince to wed Ana, and recognize her child. That would have been the usual solution to a situation of a princess being pregnant.

However, marriage with a Marquis is not very unbecoming to a royal princess, using the standard of today, but also using the medieval standard. Several princely families have originated from marriages of royal daughters with a nobleman. Cf Mortimer, Stuart, Hohenstaufen, Coucy of Soissons... 217.140.193.123 17:53, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Duchessless[edit]

Amidst the edit-warring over the title of Dona Ana de Jesus Maria de Bragança and her article, didn't any of the warriors bother to read the article, and notice that she was never Duchess of Loulé? So for accuracy's sake, the article must be re-named. FactStraight (talk) 04:08, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Coat of Arms of the Most Serene and Royal House of Braganza.gif Nominated for Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Coat of Arms of the Most Serene and Royal House of Braganza.gif, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests February 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Coat of Arms of the Most Serene and Royal House of Braganza.gif)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 13:57, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]