Talk:Indonesia–Australia Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement

Trade Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trade, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Trade on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TradeWikipedia:WikiProject TradeTemplate:WikiProject TradeTrade articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

International relations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Indonesia Low‑importance

	Indonesia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indonesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Indonesia and Indonesia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IndonesiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndonesiaTemplate:WikiProject IndonesiaIndonesia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia Low‑importance

	Australia portal Indonesia–Australia Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

A fact from Indonesia–Australia Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 19 March 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that negotiations for the Indonesia–Australia Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement were hindered by spying and executions?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2020/March. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Indonesia–Australia Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement.

Wikipedia

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:58, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that negotiations of the IA-CEPA was hindered by spying and executions? Source: Previously, talks about the IA-CEPA were put on hold amid a period of severe diplomatic tensions between both nations involving the "2013 spy-scandal", the execution of two Australian citizens
- ALT1:... that Australia's recognition of West Jerusalem as Israel's capital impacted negotiations of its bilateral agreement with Indonesia? Source: [1]

Reviewed: The Race Against Time

Moved to mainspace by Juxlos (talk). Self-nominated at 16:03, 14 February 2020 (UTC).[reply]

Article appears to be new enough, long enough, and well enough sourced. The article appears to be written neutrally, and the hook facts are both supported by inline citations. It may be better to unpipe the link in the first hook, I don't think that makes it too long. QPQ is provided. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:50, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]