Talk:In the Night (ballet)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 7 February 2018[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover)Zawl 15:48, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]



In the NightIn the Night (ballet) – Not the primary topic. JE98 (talk) 17:30, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ᐐT₳LKᐬ 17:37, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

DYK nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by The C of E (talk) 15:22, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • ... that Jerome Robbins' ballet In the Night is set to four nocturnes by Frédéric Chopin? Source: "'In the Night,' set to four Chopin Nocturnes, is not merely a 'Son of Dances at a Gathering,' or 'Gathering Revisited'; rather, it is a further extension of Robbins's choreographic thoughts in spired by Chopin's piano music." ([1])
  • Reviewed: TBD

5x expanded by Corachow (talk). Self-nominated at 19:40, 23 January 2021 (UTC).[reply]

  • Long enough (87 to 693 words since August), expansion is new enough, hook is hooky and condensed, earwig at 23.1% but mostly attributed quotes, article reads well and is most interesting. Awaiting QPQ. Ceoil (talk) 00:32, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Good to go; nice work. Ceoil (talk) 23:33, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]